Wednesday, January 28, 2015

Armalite AR-10 Redesigned – Hot New Products – SHOT Show 2015

Armalite 2015
Walking up to the Armalite booth this year at Shot Show 2015, I could see that Armalite has been busy. Very busy. At first glance I was confused; I’d expected the familiar Armalite ARs. But they’re not there. The entirety of the AR line has been overhauled. They’ve introduced 15 new models. It is clear that Armalite has emerged out of the cave and walked proudly into the 21st century.
Starting with the basics, the most noticeable changes are aesthetics. They’ve made the rifles sleek and sexy, which was not an easy task. They had to start from the ground up, making vast improvements to the furniture they use. They are producing their own hand-guards, now. Standing out among the crowd are two rifles, the AR10 3GN13 and the M15 TAC18.
Armalite 1734
The AR10 3GN13 is a purpose built competition gun. Designed to be both light and powerful, this rifle is chambered in .308 and sports a 13.5-inch barrel. It has an adjustable compensator that is pinned to the barrel which brings the overall length to just over 16 inches. The gun is built for speed, and ease of use, with easily manipulated controls. Features such as the ambidextrous charging handle and safety selector, Timney trigger, Ergo wide grip, and MBA adjustable stock make this rifle quick into action as well as easy to shoot. Coming in at $1,999 this rifle is a bargain and a half for the competitive shooter.
Armalite 1727
The M15 TAC18 is a rifle that is built for precision as well as hard use. Chambered in .223 and sporting an 18inch stainless steel 1/8-twist barrel, this rifle is built for extreme accuracy. With the OSS Banner Break, recoil, and muzzle climb should be close to non-existent. This one has ambidextrous controls, Magpul furniture, a 2-stage match trigger, and the Armalite Tactical Forend. The price-tag is  $1600.
Click on over to Armalite to see the rest of the new guns. And keep your eyes open–next year should bring an overhaul of the bolt guns.
Armalite 1736
The depth of the new designs is even more impressive when you see them all together.
Armalite 1735
It was hard to wrap my head around all of the new models.
If you're looking for one of these bolt guns, the time to pull the trigger is now. Or this year. They may be next to get redesigned.
If you’re looking for one of these bolt guns, the time to pull the trigger is now. Or this year. They may be next to get redesigned.
Every little detail is getting the new Armalite treatment.
Every little detail is getting the new Armalite treatment.

WWII German MP40 in 9mm – SHOT Show 2015

German Sport Guns, GSG, was at SHOT Show 2015 showing off what maybe their coolest product yet–an MP40 in the original 9mm caliber.  GSG makes a MP40 now but it is in .22LR.  That is mainly what they make, reproduction military arms in .22.
All of their guns are imported to the US by American Tactical Imports.
The new MP40 in 9mm has initial approval from the ATF at the time of the show.  The representative at the booth said that they will be sending the ATF a working gun in April for final approval. Once that is obtained, they will begin production and importation.  The guns will be sold without a shoulder stock (as pistols).  If you file a Form 1 and get a stamp for an SBR, they will sell you the folding stock like the originals had.
These are not 100% true to the originals.  The internals are different on the action.  There was a bit of a language barrier with the rep at the booth, but I understood him to say that it had to be changed due to ease of full auto conversion.  The original MP40 fired off an open bolt.  The new Thompson’s had to be changed for similar reasons.  Another change will be the addition of a safety.
If all goes well with the ATF, they hope to start shipment to the US later this year.  MSRP is projected to be in the $550 range.
Version with a fake silencer to make the barrel length over 16". This one is on .22, they might make on like it in 9mm.
Version with a fake silencer to make the barrel length over 16″. This one is on a .22–they might make on like it in 9mm.
In pistol configuration. The stock goes on the round spot.
In pistol configuration. The stock goes on the round spot.
Folding stock.
Folding stock.
Bolt.  But doesn't fire off an open bolt.
Bolt. But doesn’t fire off an open bolt.
MP-40 9mm.
MP-40 9mm.
Sights.
Sights.
We have ways of making you talk!
We have ways of making you talk!
The added safety.
The added safety.
A look in with the bolt open.
A look in with the bolt open.
Looks worth getting a stamp for to me!
Looks worth getting a stamp for to me!

Join NRA

Monday, January 26, 2015

Evidence: Hands Off! Don’t Move It!

 Evidence: Hands Off! Don’t Move It! Kevin_ITF_Article_1-26-15 Kevin Michalowski | January 26, 2015 | 0 Comments inShare If you are involved in a deadly force incident, don’t touch the evidence! No matter what you have heard from jailhouse lawyers and barstool commandos, tampering with evidence is the quickest way to move yourself from victim to suspect. This comes up again because we have received a few notes at Concealed Carry Magazine asking about such things. I can’t even begin to describe how incredibly bad an idea it is to touch anything at a crime scene. Keep your hands off the evidence. Keep your eye on it. Point it out to arriving officers, but don’t touch it. Into the Fray, Episode 46: Hands Off! Don’t Move The Evidence Tampering with evidence is a crime. If you’re forced to defend yourself with a gun, do not touch ANYTHING. If you are involved in a deadly force incident, don’t touch anything after the shooting. Focus on your safety and be prepared to make a statement after your attorney arrives. If you move anything, your intentions quickly become suspect as you have tampered with evidence.

Texas: Summary of Major Pro- & Anti-Gun Legislation Filed To Date in the Legislature

NRA-ILA: Institute for Legislative Action Texas: Summary of Major Pro- & Anti-Gun Legislation Filed To Date in the Legislature The Texas Legislature convened for its 2015 Regular Session on January 13. Dozens of pro-Second Amendment measures were either pre-filed or have been introduced in recent weeks, along with a handful of sweeping gun control bills. The filing deadline for legislation is not until March 13, and NRA-ILA anticipates that many more firearm- and hunting-related bills, both good and bad, will materialize between now and then. Contact information for state Senators can be found at www.senate.state.tx.us and for House members at www.house.state.tx.us. A list of Senate Committees was released late Friday and the House is still organizing itself, so the following measures have not yet been assigned to committee or scheduled for a hearing in either chamber. NRA-ILA will keep you informed as to where these bills are referred and when they see action, but in the meantime, here’s a rundown of the major legislation we are tracking thus far in Austin that could affect Texas gun owners and sportsmen: Campus Carry Today, state Senator Brian Birdwell (R-Granbury), along with 19 Senate co-authors, and state Representative Allen Fletcher (R-Tomball) introduced Senate Bill 11 and House Bill 937, respectively, to remove restrictions in state law that prohibit law-abiding, adult Concealed Handgun Licensees (CHLs) from protecting themselves on college and university campuses. You can expect to see the same misguided bias against these bills from some in the Texas media this session, but interestingly, a major newspaper in Nevada recently endorsed and strongly recommended passage of a similar measure filed in that state’s legislature. From the editorial, entitled: “Law-abiding citizens shouldn’t be defenseless on college campuses”: ‘Bad guys don’t obey gun laws, on college campuses and elsewhere. Lawmakers who oppose campus carry proposals must acknowledge that gun-free zones essentially create defenseless target zones. Considering the president of the United States and college administrators claim there is a sexual assault crisis on college campuses, why would lawmakers deny women the ability to defend themselves?’ - Las Vegas Review Journal To read the editorial in its entirety, please click here. Open Carry Numerous versions of open carry bills have been filed, which can best be broken down into the following categories: Constitutional or Permitless Carry: House Bill 195, pre-filed by state Representative Jonathan Stickland (R-Bedford) and Senate Bill 342 by state Senator Don Huffines (R-Dallas) would remove the requirement that an individual obtain a Concealed Handgun License in order to carry a legally-possessed firearm openly or concealed in the State of Texas. Open Carry for CHLs: House Bill 164, pre-filed by state Representative James White (R-Woodville), House Bill 910 by state Representative Larry Phillips (R-Sherman), and Senate Bill 346 by state Senator Craig Estes (R-Wichita Falls) would remove the requirement that CHLs carry their handguns hidden from plain view and allow them the option of carrying them wholly or partially visible in a belt or shoulder holster. House Bill 106, pre-filed by state Representative Dan Flynn (R-Van), House Bill 291 by state Representative Dan Huberty (R-Kingwood) and House Bill 415 by state Representative Debbie Riddle (R-Spring) are similar to those bills, but they also specify that holsters used by CHLs have dual points of resistance. Right to Hunt and Fish Constitutional Amendments As previously reported, legislation has been filed to amend the state constitution and establish an individual Right to Hunt & Fish: House Joint Resolution 61, pre-filed by state Representative Trent Ashby (R-Lufkin) and Senate Joint Resolution 22 by state Senator Brandon Creighton (R-Conroe). These important measures would ensure that future wildlife management decisions are based on sound science to protect the Lone Star State’s hunting heritage for generations to come. Clarifying or Repealing Prohibited Locations for Concealed Handgun Licensees (CHLs) House Bill 226, pre-filed by state Representative Ryan Guillen (D-Rio Grande City) and Senate Bill 273 by state Senator Donna Campbell (R-New Braunfels) would impose civil fines on state agencies, cities or counties that improperly post 30.06 signs prohibiting CHLs from public property which is not off-limits to them under the Texas Penal Code. These bills are an effort to provide much-needed clarity for license holders. House Bill 308, pre-filed by state Representative Drew Springer (R-Gainesville) would remove all restrictions on where CHLs may lawfully carry that currently exist in the Penal Code, and Senate Bill 311 by state Senator Campbell would repeal the criminal prohibition on carrying in certain locations listed in Sections 46.03 and 46.035 that are considered private property or privately-owned businesses. Second Amendment or Sportsmen’s Sales Tax Holiday House Bill 206, pre-filed by state Representative Jeff Leach (R-Plano), House Bill 712 by state Representative Drew Springer (R-Gainsville) and Senate Bill 228 by state Senator Brandon Creighton (R-Conroe) all create sales tax holidays for firearms and/or hunting supplies to be held one weekend a year around the start of hunting season. These bills are modeled after popular tax-free weekends held annually in both Louisiana and Mississippi for gun owners and sportsmen. Anti-Gun Legislation Filed To-Date State Senator Rodney Ellis (D-Houston) has filed a laundry list of deeply flawed gun control measures. You can expect to see more anti-gun bills filed on the House side before the deadline to introduce legislation passes: Senate Bill 256 bans the possession or transfer of so-called “large capacity magazines”; Senate Bill 257 creates a criminal offense for failing to report a lost or stolen firearm to a law enforcement agency within 48 hours; Senate Bill 258 restricts the private transfers of firearms at gun shows; and Senate Bill 259 criminalizes the private transfers of firearms – even between neighbors, friends, co-workers and certain family members – and establishes an immense new state bureaucracy to implement such new restrictions. While these are the major pro- & anti-gun and hunting bills filed for the 2015 session, this is by no means an exhaustive list. You can search for specific bills on particular subjects of interest to you at http://www.legis.state.tx.us/search/billsearch.aspx. Rest assured that NRA-ILA is tracking all measures affecting your rights and we will continue to report on their progress as the session moves ahead.

Sig Sauer Challenges ATF Open Letter Regarding SB-15 Brace Use

According to the BATF, how one holds this may constitute a product redesign.
According to the BATF, how one holds this may constitute a product redesign.
How to use or not to use, that is the question.
The Sig Sauer SB-15 stabilizing brace for AR-type pistols has exposed some sticky legal questions. Does the use of a product define its purpose? For example, if one uses a hammer to remove a corroded battery terminal from a 1970 Gremlin, does the use redefine that same hammer as a wrench?
Historically, the BATF, citing National Firearms Act (NFA) regulations, has adhered to clear boundaries related to the design of a firearm. If a firearm fell outside of technical definitions, its manufacture and transfer was deemed subject to the terms of the NFA. For example, if a manufacturer put forth a rifle with a 12-inch barrel, it would be subject to NFA restrictions. Clear enough, right?
In the case of the Sig Sauer SB-15 Stabilizing Brace, the ATF has gotten itself into a pickle. Initially, the agency issued a ruling in favor of the Sig Sauer stabilizing brace, stating that “We find that the device is not designed or intended to fire a weapon from the shoulder. Based on our evaluation, FTB finds that the submitted forearm brace, when attached to a firearm, does not convert the weapon to be fired from the shoulder and would not alter the classification of a pistol or other firearm.”
In a subsequent open letter, the ATF appears to contradict its stance of applying NFA regulations to firearms design rather than use. According to the newest ATF letter, “Because the NFA defines both rifle and shotgun to include any “weapon designed or redesigned, made or remade, and intended to be fired from the shoulder,” any person who redesigns a stabilizing brace for use as a shoulder stock makes a NFA firearm when attached to a pistol with a rifled barrel under 16 inches in length or a handgun with a smooth bore under 18 inches in length.”
In plain English, the ATF appears to have stated that the method of use of a firearm can qualify as a product “redesign.” Even though the parts and installation remain exactly the same, the method of holding a certain gun can create a “redesign” that makes it an illegal product. This opens up a can of worms that puts any barrel of monkeys to shame.  Back to the hammer example, if I strike a nail, the thing in my hand is still a hammer. If I smash it on a ream of copier paper, is it now a printing press subject to FCC regulation? Likewise, if one holds the Sig brace equipped pistol at shoulder height, is it illegal? What if the user mounts the brace an inch below, does that qualify as a redesign of the product?
Does a consumer’s use of a product define its intent? Does the ATF have the legal authority to define law? What is the legal authority of an “open letter” from a federal government agency? These questions and many more remain.
On January 21, 2015, Sig Sauer issued a statement addressing the issue:
“As reaffirmed in an Open Letter by ATF’s Firearms and Ammunition Technology Division dated January 16, 2015, the Pistol Stabilizing Brace (SB15 and SBX) is legal to own, legal to purchase, and legal to install on a pistol. SIG SAUER® believes that the PSB improves the single-handed shooting performance of buffer tube equipped pistols, and offers the product both as an accessory and pre-installed on a number of pistols.
“The Open Letter goes further to rescind a previous private letter regarding the ‘intent’ of the user of the pistol stabilizing brace. In the letter of January 16, 2015, ATF opines that a person’s actual use of the product as a shoulder stock can change the legal classification of the product. However, the Open Letter explicitly states: “ATF hereby confirms that if used as designed—to assist shooters in stabilizing a handgun while shooting with a single hand—the device is not considered a shoulder stock and therefore may be attached to a handgun without making a NFA firearm.”
“We question ATF’s reversal in position that the classification of the brace may be altered by its use. We are reviewing the legal precedents and justification for this position, and will address our concerns with ATF in the near future.
“We will vigorously defend the classification of all of our products and our consumers’ right to use them in accordance with the law. If we find that the open letter opinion is outside the scope of the law, we will seek further review.”
As the statement from Sig Sauer indicates, the company believes that how a customer chooses to use a product does not constitute a “product redesign.” Just because a consumer might use a can of creamed corn to pound a nail doesn’t make that packaged vegetable a hammer. It’s still a can of creamed corn, dented or not.
This is gonna get interesting folks.

Smith & Wesson

Buy Now on GunsAmerica

Specifications
  • Manufacturer:          Smith & Wesson
  • Model:                        686 Plus (Performance Center)
  • Frame Size:              L-Frame
  • Caliber:                     .357 Magnum / .38 Special +P
  • Action:                       Double Action / Singe Action
  • Capacity:                   7 Rounds
  • Barrel Length:          2.5 inches
  • Front Sight:              Red Ramp
  • Rear Sight:                Adjustable
  • Overall Length:        47.5 inches
  • Grip:                           Wood
  • Weight:                      35 ounces
  • Barrel Material:       Stainless Steel
  • Cylinder Material:   Stainless Steel
  • Frame Material:       Stainless Steel
  • Finish:                       Matte Glass Bead Blast
  • M.S.R.P.:                   $1,089
xx
There are many existing holster options for an L-frame revolver.
Snubby revolvers have been a mainstay of concealed carry since the introduction of the original Smith & Wesson “Chief’s Special” in 1950. Although immensely practical as a defensive handgun, the classic snubby revolver has always suffered from a few serious drawbacks–most notably, having a limited ammo capacity, and being difficult to shoot well. However, a little bit of modern technology and a lot of meticulous attention from the talented gunsmiths in the Smith and Wesson Performance Center have elevated the classic snubby revolver to a new level.
The Performance Center snub is distinguished by a beautiful unfluted cylinder.
The Performance Center snub is distinguished by a beautiful unfluted cylinder.
This Performance Center 686 Plus firmly straddles the line between old school and modern design. At its core, this revolver is a stainless-steel double-action revolver with wood grips and iron sights. But this 686 Plus has a capacity of seven rounds in the same diameter cylinder that used to only fit six. Combine that increased capacity with the magic of some fine-tuning in the Performance Center, and you have a thoroughly modern defensive revolver.

Better Features

Of course, this PC 686 Plus is considerably larger than the classic 5-shot snubby revolver. At 7.5 inches long and nearly 35 ounces in weight, this gun is not suited for pocket carry. However, if you are willing to carry a larger revolver, the size increase pays huge dividends. The 686 Plus has good-sized wood stocks that will fit even large hands. And, the larger “L-frame” makes for a more comfortable grip and trigger reach than small-frame snubbies.
smith 1651
Seven rounds of .357 Magnum is quite a bit of firepower.
Since 1996, Smith & Wesson has offered L-frame .357 Magnum revolvers in six or seven shot capacities. Although the cylinder diameter is the same, modern advances in materials technology have allowed the cylinder walls to be thinned enough to fit an extra round. While some traditionalists still prefer the traditional 6- round L-frame, when it comes to a defensive revolver, the extra round is a huge benefit.   By comparison, the 686 Plus has 40% more capacity than a typical small-frame snub nose revolver.   With seven rounds on tap, the 686 Plus is approaching the capacity of most single-stack semi-auto pistols suitable for concealed carry. All of a sudden, carrying a revolver instead of a semi-auto doesn’t seem like so much of a compromise in ammunition capacity.
Perhaps the most distinguishing feature of this particular 686 Plus is the extra attention from Smith & Wesson’s talented Performance Center gunsmiths. Performance Center guns are Smith & Wesson’s best products, designed for their most demanding customers. This translates into a high level of fit and finish, but more importantly, a well-tuned action. This type of refinement is particularly valuable in a double-action revolver, which can have a long and heavy trigger. The Performance Center tuning produces a light and smooth trigger pull. Together with the smaller required rotation of the 7-shot cylinder, this 686 Plus trigger is a delight. I have experienced better revolver triggers on finicky target guns, but the Performance Center guns strike a proper balance between a light trigger and rock solid reliability.
The Performance Center snub is adorned with a few distinguishing cosmetic features, like the unfluted cylinder and the slab-side barrel. The gun also sports an engraved Performance Center logo on the left side-plate, and a laser etching on the barrel shroud. Both give the revolver a unique custom appearance.
smith 1645
The 2.5 inch barrel a still produces muzzle velocities over 1,100 feet per second.

Better Performance

Shooting a snubby revolver is usually a challenge. Shooting a .357 Magnum snubby revolver is always a challenge. I have mostly given up on shooting small-frame Magnums, unless I am required to do so. It can be done, but I am not a fan.
Shooting .357 Magnum rounds from an L-frame snubby revolver, however, is a far better experience. The additional weight, along with the larger frame and grips, make a big difference. Although shooting Magnums will still definitely get your attention, the gun is manageable with a proper crush grip. Regardless, a snubby Magnum revolver is not well suited to anyone who is recoil sensitive. At least you always have the option of shooting .38 Special +P, if desired.
Even with the short barrel, this 686 Plus offers strong ballistic performance with Magnum loads. I tested four different brands of premium defensive ammo, and all produced average muzzle velocity in excess of 1,100 feet per second. At these velocities, you should be able to expect excellent performance from modern expanding jacketed hollow point bullets.
The 686 Plus is also exceptionally accurate for snubby. I had no problem with drilling out the x-ring of a standard NRA target at 7 yards. Similarly, a steel plate rack at 10 yards can be cleared with no problem. Even at 25 yards, head shots on a silhouette are easy to come by. This is due in part to the revolver’s excellent adjustable rear sight, and high visibility red ramp front sight.
This revolver is also set up for using moonclips, which hold all seven rounds as a single unit for ease of loading and unloading. A discussion of the pros and cons of moonclips is unfortunately beyond the scope of this article. The utility of moonclips in a defensive revolver is open to debate–but there is no drawback to having the cylinder cut to accept them. With this 686 Plus, you have the option of using moonclips or not.
smith 1646
The Performance Center logo is tastefully applied to the left side.

Better Snubby

While not really fair to compare this gun to a traditional small-frame snubby revolver, that is a natural comparison. The PC 686 Plus snub is much easier to shoot, more accurate, and more powerful. With seven rounds of .357 Magnum on tap, this gun compares favorably with the firepower of many semi-automatic handguns. If you are a “revolver guy,” and want to carry a wheel gun, you don’t have to feel under gunned with this 686 Plus.
Prices of quality revolvers have been creeping up in recent years. A standard 686 Plus snubby retails for $849. Performance Center guns, however, always command a premium price. The PC version of the 686 Plus snub retails for $1,089. For the extra $240, you get wood grips, different sights, a cylinder cut for moonclips, and a hand tuned action. In my opinion, the extra cash is very well spent. As with any Smith & Wesson firearm, the 686 Plus is covered with a lifetime service policy, and their customer service is some of the best in the business.
Carrying a snub nose revolver is always a compromise of some kind. The Performance Center 686 Plus addresses some of these shortcomings with additional capacity and ease of use. Unfortunately, that additional capability comes in a package much larger than the traditional snubby revolver. If you can cope with the additional size and weight, this is a remarkable carry gun. A blend of old and new technology, with some custom craftsmanship thrown in, makes this 686 Plus a better snubby, and a great choice for carry.
The author would like to thank Winchester (www.winchester.com), Federal (www.federal premium.com), and Hornady (www.hornady.com), for providing ammunition for testing. All shooting was done at the Southern Exposure training facility in Lakeland, Florida (www.southernexposuretraining.com).
smith 1654
This snub feels great in the author’s large hands.
smith 1653
The business end of a .357 Magnum will get your attention!
smith 1650
The Performance Center snub is distinguished by a beautiful unfluted cylinder.
smith 1649
The author carried the 686 Plus in a simple belt slide holster from Don Hume.
The wooden grips on the 686 look good and offer excellent grip.
The wooden grips on the 686 look good and offer excellent grip.
smith 1648
Performance Center guns come in a gray hard case.