Thursday, October 22, 2015

6 charged in 'wholesale slaughter' of animals in Leon County

A pair of seemingly unconnected investigations by law enforcement officers in Leon County - one by Texas game wardens looking into a landowner's report of a suspected poaching incident, the other by county sheriff's deputies investigating incidents of vandalism and other property crimes - resulted this week in arrests tied to what state wildlife law enforcement officials say ranks as the most egregious, disturbingly vicious poaching-related case any can recall.
Six Centerville residents, four charged as adults and two juveniles, face a flood of criminal charges, including a total of 120 felonies and 58 Class A misdemeanors, for violations of state wildlife laws tied to what Col. Craig Hunter, director of Texas Parks and Wildlife Department's law enforcement division, called "wholesale slaughter of game animals, non-game wildlife and domestic animals."
According to officers, the group illegally killed at least 68 white-tailed deer, an assortment of other wildlife including alligator, blue heron, vulture and egret, six head of cattle (one of which was hacked to death with a machete) and several domestic cats during a three-month frenzy of criminal acts that included more than a dozen burglaries and several acts of vandalism and other damage to private and public property.


The suspects also face criminal charges in those non-wildlife-related cases; the Leon County Sheriff's Office has filed charges on three of the suspects and is preparing to file charges on the other three. The six, facing felony charges that carry prison terms of as much as two years, also could face federal wildlife-related criminal charges and, if convicted of state charges, well over $10,0000 in civil restitution for illegally taken wildlife.
'Beyond poaching'
Game wardens seized nine firearms, including a .22 rifle fit with a homemade sound suppressor, from the group.
All of the charges involve violations alleged to have occurred in Leon County, a rural county located about midway between Houston and Dallas and bisected by Interstate 45.
Those charged as adults are Daniel Wyatt Pate, 20, and John Edward Persaud, 19, along with two 17-year-olds.
Two juveniles also face charges in the cases.
"I don't know how to compare this to anything I've seen before," Capt. Mike Hanson, Rusk-based supervisor for TPWD's law enforcement division and 23-year veteran Texas game warden, said of the case. "The scope is just way beyond poaching deer."
State game wardens began investigating the case after a Sept. 1 call from a landowner who had found a whitetail doe, dead from a gunshot, in his pasture the morning after his wife told him she had heard a shot during the night, Hanson said. At the same time, the Leon County Sheriff's Office was investigating a series of property crimes in the rural county. Those investigations began turning up information that tied suspects to both cases. TPWD wardens Oscar Hensen and Randy Harper and Sgt. Brian Stafford of the Leon County Sheriff's Office worked together and broke the case.
According to investigators, between June 4 and Sept 1, the six were involved in serial illegal activity that regularly included poaching whitetail deer at night.
'Some kind of record'
The investigation documented 68 illegally taken deer, most of them shot from motor vehicles at night from public roadways. In some instances, officers allege, the poaching occurred on the feeder roads of Interstate 45; officers said at least 15 deer were poached from land adjacent to the heavily traveled highway. In several instances, the suspects returned multiple times to the same areas, killing deer and committing other crimes, officers said. They killed as many as five deer in a single night of poaching, sometimes removing back straps and hindquarters from the deer but often simply leaving the animals to rot where they fell, Hanson said.
The total tally of deerillegally killed by the group almost certainly is much higher than the 68 whitetails they are charged with poaching, officers said. That total could easily exceed 100 when deer that were wounded and died later or were poached and not found or otherwise documented are included.
"We've really got no way to measure how many deer, total, were involved," Hanson said.
But even at 68 deer, the total far exceeds the largest number of deer involved in a single poaching case any TPWD law enforcement officers can recall.
"There have been cases where we've had people take a dozen or so deer over a period of time; I think 17 or 20 is the most I've ever heard of," Hanson said. "This case has got to be some kind of record."
'Pretty vicious crimes'
Officials underscored that the poaching of deer and illegal killing of other wildlife was just a part of the three-month crime spree that included shooting out the window of a business, shooting road signs, destroying mailboxes, shooting a parked truck as well as the burglaries (most of hunter's deer camps), the killing of livestock and the shooting of house cats and other animals.
The extent and range of crimes alleged against those charged shocked even veteran game wardens.
"I don't think I've ever see a case like this in the 41 years I've been in law enforcement," Hunter, TPWD game warden chief, said. "There are some pretty vicious crimes in there."
The charges filed against the group reflect the extent of those alleged crimes. The 120 felony charges filed against the group are for killing a white-tailed deer on private property without the consent of the landowner; each violation is a state jail felony punishable by as much as two years in prison and a fine of $10,000. The 58 Class A misdemeanor charges are for hunting from a public roadway and carry a penalty of as much as a year in jail and a $4,000 fine.
Game wardens said they were surprised that the poaching ring could operate for three months, firing what they suspect was hundreds of rounds of gunfire, usually at night, sometimes within view of travelers on Interstate 45 and leaving dead deer and other wildlife - evidence of crimes - scattered around the county without anyone reporting suspicious activity to law enforcement.
"It's baffling, particularly when you know how protective most landowners and hunters are of deer and other wildlife," Hanson said of how the group seemed to operate without fear of being reported or caught.
During their investigation, officers learned many landowners and others had heard gunshots during the night but never reported the incidents to wardens or other law enforcement.

Tuesday, October 20, 2015

6 Reasons for Texans to Vote Yes on Proposition 6 this November!

6 Reasons for Texans to Vote Yes on Proposition 6 this November!

This November, Texans will have the opportunity to vote on a constitutional amendment to create permanent protections for sportsmen and conservation in Texas. Voting "YES" on Proposition 6 will protect the Lone Star State's outdoor heritage for future generations of Texas hunters and anglers. Here are just 6 reasons why all Texans need to vote YES on Prop 6 this November to protect wildlife and promote conservation efforts that sportsmen have spearheaded for generations.
  1. Hunting and fishing are an essential part of Texas’ (and America’s) cultural fabric.


    Approval of Prop 6 will protect future generations of Texas hunters and anglers from extremists who will dedicate themselves to eliminating these treasured outdoor traditions in the Lone Star State!
  2. The freedom to hunt, fish and harvest wildlife in Texas currently has no constitutional protection.


    The freedom to hunt and fish is a fundamental right that people often take for granted; putting it in the Texas Constitution is the best way for Texans to ensure that future generations have the opportunity to enjoy this rich, outdoor heritage.
     
  3. Across the country, hunting and fishing are under attack like never before.


    Well-funded, national anti-hunting groups that seek to ban all hunting, trapping and fishing are more active now than ever before on the state and local levels.
     
  4. Prop 6 would guarantee that future wildlife conservation and management decisions are based on sound science.


    Prop 6 would ensure that wildlife conservation and management decisions continue to be based on sound science in order to preserve Texas' hunting heritage for generations to come and to protect it against future attacks based on misguided emotions.
     
  5. Hunting and fishing are economically beneficial to Texas.


    According to the Congressional Sportsmen’s Foundation, the Lone Star State's hunters and anglers spend $4.1 billion annually and support 65,993 jobs.
     
  6. Currently, 18 states have Right to Hunt and Fish amendments in their constitutions.


    These constitutional safeguards are a pro-active way to defend America’s rich, outdoor heritage from radical anti-hunting and anti-fishing groups.

Sunday, October 18, 2015

MPX submachine gun


Sig Sauer SIG MCX SBR SAS stock np
Sig Sauer SIG MCX SBR

Sig Sauer Introduces the Cutting-Edge MCX For 2015

The ultra-modular new MCX from Sig Sauer can quickly transform from a 300 BLK carbine to a 5.56mm SBR to a 7.62x39mm pistol—or any combination in between!
Sig Sauer has been pushing the envelope in recent years with its MPX submachine gun and P320 striker-fired pistol series, but now, in 2015, the company has gone even further by introducing its MCX series.
  • RELATED: New For 2015: Sig Sauer Unveils Next-Gen SIG MCX
  • RELATED: Sig Sauer’s MPx 9mm SMG Is a Compact Powerhouse
The MCX is an extremely modular platform that allows users to adapt its barrel, handguard, stock and chambering—5.56mm NATO, 300 Blackout or 7.62x39mm. Multiple barrel lengths are available, including 9-, 11.5-, 14.5- and 16-inch units, and shooters can quickly swap those in along with a new handguard, such as a slim KeyMod version or a larger one that will cover a suppressor, by accessing two captive Torx screws. For stocks, shooters can choose between a skeletonized folding stock, a retractable MPX-style stock, an SBX stabilizing brace for pistols, a collapsible M4-style stock or a slim, folding, retractable stock.
All of the MCX’s controls are ambidextrous, including the charging handle, safety selector and magazine catch. The gun was designed for 100-percent suppressor use, so the cam path is made of steel for extra durability. The feed ramps are also made of steel and are removable. The charging handle has steel pins. Finally, the forward assist deflector assembly is removable and replaceable. All of these features enhance the MCX’s extreme reliability. Sig will also offer MCX upper assemblies for use on AR-platform lowers.
For more information, visit sigsauer.com or call 603-610-3000.

The Cutting Edge in Tactical Firearms

The Cutting Edge in Tactical Firearms

When it comes to mission profiles, the only constant is change. When FN designs a tactical firearms system, flexibility in real world military and law enforcement operational environments is a key factor. Tactical Systems are developed from the ground up to address the specific challenges of modern tactical situations. The FN SCAR® 16 and FN SCAR® 17 are the law enforcement variants of the newest U.S. military weapon system. The FN P90® with its innovative 5.7x28mm ammunition is the ultimate tool for today’s VIP protective detail missions, close-quarters combat, urban operations and dynamic entry scenarios.

FN SCAR<sup>®</sup> Series FN P90<sup>®</sup> Series

FN SCAR® Series

FN P90® Series

FN F2000<sup>®</sup> Series

FN F2000® Series

Browning Automatic Rifle (BAR)

AUTOLOADING SPEED–BOLT-ACTION ACCURACY

Inspired by the legendary Browning Automatic Rifle (BAR) made famous in battle by Allied forces around the globe, the FNAR puts autoloading speed and bolt-action accuracy into one powerful package. Chambered in 7.62x51mm NATO (308 Win.) the FNAR is available with either a 16" or 20" cold hammer-forged MIL-SPEC fluted barrel with chrome-lined bore and target crown. The matte black synthetic pistol grip tactical stock is fully adjustable. The FNAR is equipped with multiple MIL-STD 1913 rails for mounting your choice of accessories. It is a multi-role, mid-caliber rifle that is ideally suited for recreational, long-range target and competition shooting.

FNAR<sup>™</sup> Standard FNAR<sup>™</sup> Heavy

FNAR Standard

FNAR Heavy

FNAR<sup>™</sup> Competition

FNAR Competition

THE WORLDS FINEST MACHINE GUNS

THE WORLDS FINEST MACHINE GUNS

Whenever the discussion turns to machine guns, the name FN proudly stands front and center. No other company in the world has more experience in the design, engineering and manufacturing of belt-fed automatic weapons than FN – from the legacy designs of John M. Browning that have protected America’s soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines for nearly a century, to today’s machine gun variations that accompany our warfighters into harm’s way. FN makes the finest machine guns in the world. Period.
FN machine guns cover the entire spectrum: Light Machine Guns (LMG), Medium Machine Guns (MMG) and Heavy Machine Guns (HMG). The FN Family of Light Machine Guns consists of the M249 (also known as FN MINIMI®) and the lightweight MK 46 Mod 1 in 5.56x45mm, and the larger caliber, lightweight MK 48 Mod 1 in 7.62x51mm. The FN Family of Medium Machine Guns consists of the M240 (also known as FN MAG® or FN MAG® 58) series in 7.62x51mm. Finally, the FN Family of Heavy Machine Guns consists of the FN M2HB-QCB, FN M3P and FN M3M (GAU-21) in .50 caliber.

M249 Series MK 48/MK 46 Series

M249 Series

MK 48/MK 46 Series

M240 Series

FN M2HB-QCB<sup>™</sup>

M240 Series

FN M2HB-QCB

Saturday, October 17, 2015

Hillary Clinton Supports Australia-style Gun Confiscation

Hillary Clinton Supports Australia-style Gun Confiscation

Friday, October 16, 2015

It’s one thing to support gun control. 
It’s another to make it the centerpiece of a floundering presidential primary campaign. 
But Hillary Clinton wasn’t finished when she latched onto the idea of opposing the NRA as a means of diverting the nation from the humiliating scandals and poll results plaguing her own bid to succeed Barack Obama.
First, she announced to her wealthy supporters that “the Supreme Court is wrong on the Second Amendment,” which demonstrates her opposition to the individual right to keep and bear firearms, including handguns, for self-defense.
Now, however, she’s gone even further and echoed President Obama’s references to Australian and British style gun control.
Today, at a town hall meeting in Keene, New Hampshire, Clinton was questioned by an audience member who noted that Australia “managed to … take away … millions of handguns, and in one year, they were all gone.” He then asked her, “Can we do that?”
She immediately responded that not just Australia but also the U.K. is “a good example” of a country responding to a “mass killing.” 
 “The Australian example,” she said, “that was a buyback program.” She went on to explain that the Australian government “offered a good price” for “buying hundreds of thousands of guns, and then they basically clamped down going forward … .”  They were thus able, she explained, “to curtail the supply” of guns and “to set a different standard for gun purchases in the future.”  
Here in America, she went on, “I think it would be worth considering doing it on the national level if that could be arranged.” She compared the Australian and U.K. regimes to local gun “buybacks” and to Obama’s own “cash for clunkers” program, in which Americans were offered tax credits for trading older, gas-guzzling vehicles for newer, fuel-efficient models. “So I think that’s worth considering,” Clinton said. “I don’t know enough details to tell you … how we would do it or how it would work, but certainly the Australian example is worth looking at.”
The more details you know about Australia and Great Britain, however, the more extreme Hillary’s views become.
The misnamed “buybacks” of Australia and Great Britain were nothing like the failed “cash for clunkers” program, which simply sought to update the cars Americans drove, not to ban them. They weren’t even comparable to local gun buybacks, which attempt to incentivize the voluntary surrender of guns that their owners are free in most cases to replace as they see fit.
No, the Australian and U.K. “buybacks” were merely an attempt to mollify firearm owners whose property had been declared contraband and subject to seizure. They were, to paraphrase Vito Corleone, an offer gun owners could not refuse. The owners had the “choice” to accept the money and turn the guns they had previously been forced to register (supposedly so they could keep them under grandfather provisions), or they could risk the government forcibly confiscating the guns and being sent to prison for possessing them (supposing, of course, that they survived the confiscation attempt itself). 
If you own a gun now, take heed. President Obama and now Hillary Clinton finally made clear what they’re really after – national gun confiscation.
To hear Hillary’s remarks for yourself, see the video at this link: http://freebeacon.com/issues/clinton-australian-style-gun-control-worth-considering-for-u-s/.
The stakes in 2016 could not be higher when it comes to our fundamental freedom and the future of our nation.