Wednesday, October 5, 2016

Aliens Are Registered or Voting… and in Pennsylvania, by the Thousands

Yes, Virginia, Aliens Are Registered or Voting… and in Pennsylvania, by the Thousands

Wouldn’t it be nice if just once, some of the people whom Soros pays to tell us that voter fraud doesn’t exist admitted they were wrong? What if government documents were produced to show at least 1,000 instances of voter fraud with aliens registering or voting in a key swing state? Would they recant?
That’s asking too much. They earn their salaries by pretending voter fraud is a myth, and convincing others in the media to parrot their lies.
So today we learn that in the key swing state of Virginia, voter registration rolls have been polluted with an excess of a thousand aliens, and most certainly far more.  This detailed study by the Public Interest Legal Foundation (which I assisted on) documents more than one thousand aliens on the voter rolls. It provides the government documents with the names.
Here’s the most frightening part: the sample is only eight Virginia counties and doesn’t include the behemoths of Arlington and Fairfax Counties. I’ll get to why that information is being concealed by election officials in a moment below.
In just eight Virginia counties, 1,046 alien non-citizens successfully registered to vote. Mind you, these are just the aliens who were accidentally caught because when they renewed their driver’s license, they told the truth that they were a non-citizen.
That’s because of Motor Voter. Motor Voter, or the National Voter Registration Act of 1993, mandates that anyone who applies for a driver’s license must be offered voter registration. To register, they must merely mark a checkbox that they are a citizen and sign the form. It’s a yes-no question, and thousands are lying — just in Virginia.
Virginia has no citizenship verification requirements like other states do, so the vulnerabilities in Motor Voter are amplified.  Voter ID is no solution either. These aliens are getting registered to vote when they are getting their photo ID cards!
Some groups like it this way. Soros-fueled organizations have brought lawsuits to stop states from verifying citizenship of registrants. The Advancement Project and Demos are the answers to the Jeopardy question: Who would ever be against verifying the citizenship of voters?
Another question – why would they fight steps to prevent foreign influence on American elections? – raises even more ominous possibilities.
The Virginia report by PILF contains the responses of just eight Virginia counties to public inspection requests under Motor Voter for list maintenance documents demonstrating aliens who have been removed from the rolls.
The report only reflects the eight counties that complied with the request, and only reflects the aliens who were caught. Without question, many many more aliens remain on the rolls who haven’t been caught. But at least now we have the names of people who were removed from the rolls by the hundreds for citizenship problems.

Monday, October 3, 2016

WWII M1 Helmet Fixed Bale front seam liner

WWII M1 Helmet Fixed Bale front seam liner

The Ultimate Scout Rifle—Full Review

 The Ultimate Scout Rifle—Full Review

The Steyr Scout is the culmination of Jeff Cooper's concept of a light yet capable rifle. Shown equipped with a Leupold Scout Scope. Image courtesy of the manufacturer.
The Steyr Scout is the culmination of Jeff Cooper’s concept of a light yet capable rifle. Image courtesy of the manufacturer.
With two magazines on board, the Steyr Scout Rifle is easily tac-loaded and the operator need not carry additional ammunition on their belt.
With two magazines on board, the Steyr Scout Rifle is easily tac-loaded and the operator need not carry additional ammunition on their belt.
For more information, visit https://steyrarms.com.

The idea of owning only one rifle does not appeal to many Americans. In some European countries, government restrictions make it more common and is why drillings and vierlings—rifle and shotgun combination guns with multiple barrels—are popular there. In the United States, we can own multiple rifles specialized for almost any specific task. While this is very appealing if not an ideal situation, so is the idea of owning a single rifle you can do almost anything with.
U.S. Marine and Gunsite Academy founder Jeff Cooper began experimenting with carbines – short rifles – as early as the mid-1960s. His work with these reduced rifles led to his conceptualized solution to the one rifle question. Cooper’s Scout Rifle concept is now often looked at as mostly a set of ridged specifications regulating the physical makeup of the firearm. What is very often overlooked is the practical application and friendliness of the rifle Cooper was trying to create.
In the early 80s Jeff Cooper held a number of conferences with riflemen and others he respected. The goal was to put forth the criteria of the Scout Rifle concept Cooper had formulated around the idea of a rifle that would best suit a man working alone in the wild while operating as a military scout, hunter, or both. Though Cooper massaged the specifications over the years, his Scout Rifle could be broken down into these 10 elements.
  • Compact bolt-action rifle chambered for .308 Winchester
  • Barrel of 19 inches or less
  • Overall length of 39 inches or less
  • Forward-mounted, low-powered, long eye relief optical sight
  • Reserve ghost ring sights
  • Ching or C.W. shooting sling, with hammerhead recessed attachments
  • Good trigger
  • Integrated bipod
  • Mechanism for storing extra magazine or ammunition in the buttstock
  • Maximum weight of seven pounds unloaded, with all accessories attached
Cooper’s definition went far beyond elemental makeup; he wanted a rifle that was “friendly” and stipulated its most outstanding characteristic was “handiness.” He wanted a rifle that was ideally adapted to the snap shot, while still providing two MOA or better precision out to any reasonable shooting distance. Cooper wanted a “general-purpose” rifle.
This is Cooper’s second prototype Scout Rifle and he called it Sweetheart; it is the rifle Zedrosser from Steyr worked with when he came to Gunsite.
This is Cooper’s second prototype Scout Rifle and he called it Sweetheart; it is the rifle Zedrosser from Steyr worked with when he came to Gunsite.
Cooper worked with a variety of gunsmiths trying to construct prototypes meeting these specifications, but what he really wanted was that a major firearms manufacturer to mass-produce his conceptualized carbine. Over the next several years Cooper came close to creating a Scout Rifle with his prototypes, but it was 1990 when a major firearms manufacturer finally showed interest. Cooper met with Steyr Mannlicher to explain his concept rifle, but Steyr was too busy with other projects to commit at that point. However, the idea was not scrapped and Cooper invited Steyr engineer Herr Ulrich Zedrosser to visit Gunsite and try his best prototype Scout Rifle to better understand the concept.
Zedrosser went to Gunsite and was very impressed with how well “Scout II” or “Sweetheart” – Cooper’s second prototype Scout Rifle – worked. Zedrosser immediately began sketching ideas and seven years later the Steyr Scout Rifle was unveiled at the Whittington Center in Raton, New Mexico, in October of 1997. A Steyr press release contained the following description, and it read as though Cooper had written it himself:
“The essential element of the Scout Rifle is handiness. It is a general-purpose arm intended to all things that a rifle might be called upon to do, with the exception of certain specialties, such as formal target shooting and hunting pachyderms. Conceptually, it renders all extant general-purpose rifles obsolete. The man who owns a Steyr Scout has no need for any other rifle.”
This mule deer is the first game animal Cooper took with the Steyr Scout Rifle. Circa – 1997, Gunsite Academy photo.
This mule deer is the first game animal Cooper took with the Steyr Scout Rifle. Circa – 1997, Gunsite Academy photo.

SPECS

  • Chambering: .223 Rem., .243 Win., 7mm-08 Rem., .308 Win
  • Barrel: 19 inches
  • OA Length: 38.5 to 39.4 inches
  • Weight: 6 pounds, 12 ounces
  • Stock: Synthetic
  • Sights: Pop up ghost ring rear, blade front
  • Action: Bolt
  • Finish: Matte black
  • Capacity: 5, or 10 with the extended magazine kit
  • MSRP: $ 1,499.00

From Dream to Reality

Even by today’s standards, the Steyr Scout Rifle’s appearance is radical, but the radicalness of the Steyr Scout is not in just its looks. The rifle is built on Steyr’s SBS action which has a four lug bolt with a 70° lift. The lugs lock into a bushing with a steel safety ring that leaves the bolt head, case head and extractor, surrounded.

Though the integral bipod on the Steyr Scout Rile is not as rigid or as versatile as say a Harris bipod, it can aid with shooting and is great for resting the rifle.
Though the integral bipod on the Steyr Scout Rile is not as rigid or as versatile as say a Harris bipod, it can aid with shooting and is great for resting the rifle.
The integral bipod of the Steyr Scout folds down and forward.
The integral bipod of the Steyr Scout folds down and forward.
This system also incorporates a three-position, tang-mounted rolling safety. In the forward “FIRE” position a red dot is visible. In the center position, the trigger is locked and both a white dot and a button are visible on the rolling wheel. With the safety in this position, the bolt can be cycled without worry of negligent discharge. If the button is depressed and the wheel is rolled to the rear “LOCKED SAFE” position, you can press down on the bolt handle and lock it in place. This circumvents the bolt from being accidentally opened if it snags on something. To place the rifle in either the center safe or fire position, press the button and roll the wheel forward. When this is done the bolt shifts out of the locked position.
It’s all a rather ingenious affair and at first blush might seem a bit over engineered. However, with a little practice and use it becomes second nature, blazingly fast to operate, and truly appreciated for its three-position, three-function utility.
Another departure from conventional rifle design is the aluminum alloy receiver, which extends about six inches forward of the front receiver ring. This extension serves as the foundation for the distinctive extended eye relief optical sight (or “scout scope”) that has become so emblematic of Cooper’s concept. The rifle’s thin and fluted 19-inch barrel is joined to the receiver by an interesting arrangement that uses an expanding bushing, tightened to a specific level of torque.
At the rear of the receiver on the Steyr Scout Rifle you will find a pop up ghost ring aperture sight.
At the rear of the receiver on the Steyr Scout Rifle you will find a pop up ghost ring aperture sight.
Incorporated in the rear receiver ring is a flip-up ghost ring sight adjustable for windage. Recessed in the front barrel shroud is a pop-up front blade sight that can be adjusted for elevation. Together they form the reserve sights Cooper felt a Scout Rifle must possess.
The detachable magazine is made of polymer and holds five .308 Winchester cartridges (other chamberings from .223 Rem. to 7mm-08 are also available). It has the double detent feature that allows it to be locked in place only partially inserted in the magazine well. This allows the operator to load a single cartridge by dropping it through the ejection port. They cartridge will rest on top of the loaded magazine, perfectly aligned so that the bolt can be closed to chamber the cartridge. If access to the full capacity of the magazine is desired the box only needs to be fully seated. Additionally, if the magazine is fully consumed, the operator can continue to load single cartridges through the ejection port or alternately retrieve the spare full magazine that can be stored in the rifle’s buttstock.
One of the most unique features of the Steyr Scout Rile is the ability to store a spare magazine in the rifle’s butt stock.
One of the more unique features of the Steyr Scout Rile is the ability to store a spare magazine in the rifle’s buttstock.
Steyr made every attempt to honor Cooper’s concept and engineered a retractable bipod integrated into the rakish lines of the stock. The legs of the bipod are released by a push button in the bottom of the forearm and they fold down and forward. This is counter to most bipods that fold down and to the rear and it will not allow a shooter to load – put pressure against – the bipod when shooting.
Steyr also installed five hammerhead recessed sling swivel slots in the stock to permit the attachment of a traditional two-point sling or the Cooper-preferred three-point C.W. or Ching sling. Rifles are shipped with three hammerhead sling attachments allowing the operator to position the sling as desired.
Finally, and what might be the most overlooked and important aspects of the rifle deal with Cooper’s “friendliness” requirement. The butt of the stock is fitted with spacers allowing the length of pull to be adjusted to fit the shooter and the heel of the butt is rounded to facilitate ease of shouldering. The center of the comb of the Steyr Scout Rifle is very high, only a fraction of an inch below the centerline of the bore, and about 1.75 inches below the center line of a scout scope when mounted as low as possible on the rifle. Additionally, the comb of the Steyr Scout Rifle does not drop—from its nose to its heel—it rises.
This might seem to go against conventional wisdom, but Melvin Forbes of New Ultra Light Arms pioneered this concept when he introduced his model 20 lightweight rifle in 1983. (Incidentally, Forbes stocked a prototype Scout Rifle for Cooper in 1987.) By having the comb configured this way it allows the shooter to establish a solid check weld, while being able to see through the optical sight. More critically, as the rifle recoils the shooter’s cheek slides forward and down the comb. With a conventional rifle stock, with drop in the comb, the crest of the comb is driven back into the shooter’s cheek and the drop prevents the cheek or face from experiencing a comfortable interface.
The author ran a selection of Hornady, Remington and Barnes ammo through his test sample rifle with good results.
The author ran a selection of Hornady, Remington and Barnes ammo through his test sample rifle with good results.
Though many neglect the open sights on the Steyr Scout Rifle and only shoot it with a scout or traditional scope in place, they are an integral and important part of the general-purpose rifle concept.
Though many neglect the open sights on the Steyr Scout Rifle and only shoot it with a scout or traditional scope in place, they are an integral and important part of the general-purpose rifle concept.

Tips on Equipping a Scout

An integral part of being a rifleman is the ability to accurately engage targets from field positions. This is best done with the aid of a shooting sling and the Steyr Scout Rifle will easily accommodate any variety. For the purists, I’d suggest the Rhodesian or Ching Sling slings from Andy’s Leather. Both are simple, light, and made of leather.
The Ching Sling, available from Andy’s Leather, attaches at three points on the rifle and works very well with the Steyr Scout Rifle.
The Ching Sling, available from Andy’s Leather, attaches at three points on the rifle and works very well with the Steyr Scout Rifle.
Burris’ 2-7X Scout Scope is a versatile scout scope that will work for the snap shot and at distance.
Burris’ 2-7X Scout Scope is a versatile scout scope that will work for the snap shot and at distance.
Another option is a sling I worked on with Galco Gunleather called the RifleMann sling. This two-point sling made of nylon and leather allows for comfortable carry of a rifle. It’s also well suited for slinging-up with the support or shooting arm.
Though not intended as a long-range hunting rifle, the Steyr Scout Rifle took this Idaho black bear at just a shade over 400 yards.
Though not intended as a long-range hunting rifle, the Steyr Scout Rifle took this Idaho black bear at just a shade over 400 yards.
Don’t overlook the fact that you can mount a traditional riflescope on the Steyr Scout Rifle. This allows you to specifically tune the rifle to the application. And, with detachable mounts on your scout scope and traditional scope, you can switch between them, as need dictates. Alternatively, if you want to strictly stick with a “scout” scope, consider the Burris 2-7X Scout Scope with its Ballistic Plex reticle as a good compromise for general-purpose usage.
Finally, I’d suggest ammunition selection be a priority. The shorter barrel of the Steyr Scout Rifle reduces muzzle velocities and this is counter-productive to terminal performance as distance extends. Hornady’s new Precision Hunter ammo loaded with their ELD-X bullet will provide exceptional terminal performance at Steyr Scout Rifle velocities out to 500 yards.

Where It Counts

screen-shot-2016-09-21-at-2-03-50-pmIs the Steyr Scout rifle the ideal general-purpose rifle? Is it the only rifle you really need? It just might be. Keep in mind, the Scout Rifle—as Cooper envisioned it—was never intended to be the ideal whitetail, elk, coyote or safari rifle. What Cooper was searching for was the one rifle that could do all these things exceptionally well, while still having serviceable utility for personal defense or in a limited military role. In other words, Cooper saw the Scout Rifle as the one rifle answer to everything. I had a chance to put a sample Steyr Scout rifle through its paces on the range and must say I was very impressed. Although not designed as a “precision” rifle, it is more than capable of effective accuracy and performed quite well. I would say that I agree with Cooper’s assessment of the design and its capabilities.
The Steyr Scout is the culmination of Cooper's musings on the ideal all-around rifle and Steyr's (successful) efforts to achieve it.
The Steyr Scout is the culmination of Cooper’s musings on the ideal all-around rifle and Steyr’s (successful) efforts to achieve it.
I’m of the opinion Cooper and Steyr got it right. It will excel in just about any situation where volume fire is not a requirement. It can provide reliable service in many roles, while weighing less than any other rifle with all of its features. To me is the epitome of a general-purpose rifle, which is exactly what Cooper wanted, and what the Steyr Scout Rifle is supposed to be.
For more information, visit https://steyrarms.com.

Wednesday, September 28, 2016

New Gov’t Operation Denies Citizens Access to Guns & Gold

New Gov’t Operation Denies Citizens Access to Guns & Gold

loretta_lynchAs first exposed by the Wall Street Journal, the Department of Justice and bank regulators are unconstitutionally pressuring banks to refuse banking services to perfectly legal industries, under the guise that they pose a “reputation risk” to the bank. Not surprisingly, two of the main industries targeted by this illegal program just happen to be two of the biggest threats to the federal government: guns and gold. That’s right, the federal government is actively trying to choke sellers of guns & precious metals out of the financial industry. The government’s stunning objective with such an operation: to cut off American citizens from access to guns & gold completely. So if you’ve been waiting for the opportunity to defend your savings & retirement from government overreach, you better act soon.
defend_your_money_ad_banner1

Operation Choke Point

damon_geller_authorAs initially reported by the Wall Street Journal, “Operation Choke Point” was secretly launched to cut certain industries off from banking services, under the pretense that they jeopardize the “reputation” of the banks. Since no company can survive in today’s world without the ability to make banking transactions, Operation Choke Point’s clear objective is to destroy certain industries.
Which industries? As reported by the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, critics believe “it’s a thinly veiled ideological attack on industries the Obama administration doesn’t like,” such as gun sellers, precious metals companies, and coal producers.  After a huge public outcry, the FDIC issued a light retraction to the policy, but reports have recently surfaced that the gov’t & banks are still targeting industries they don’t like.
Operation Choke Point is conducted without first having shown that the targeted companies are violating the law. All of the targeted industries are perfectly legal, and the companies have not been charged with any crime. So the government is shutting legal companies out of the financial industry – effectively shutting them down – without any shred of due process! And this comes on the heels of numerous government programs to unconstitutionally confiscate citizen savings & retirement. The U.S. government is officially out of control!

Why Gold?

There’s no need to explain why the federal government would want to shut down gun manufacturers & sellers. A well regulated militia — although necessary to the security of a free state — is a direct threat to a tyrannical government. The question is, why target gold? The obvious answer: gold is as great a threat to the nefarious interests of the state as guns are!
defend_your_money_ad_banner1
Why? Because the United States and governments across the globe are increasingly turning to private wealth confiscation in order to manage their massive debts and maintain their power structure. Throughout America, police seize cash from innocent citizens without ever charging them with a crime. Bankers conspire with the IRS to seize the accounts of innocent citizens with no notification, no court order, and no charge of crimes. The IMF proposes global wealth confiscation as a means of funding bankrupt governments. And Congress passes controversial new laws to make your savings & retirement a prime target for confiscation.
So with our desperate government gaining unprecedented access to your personal savings anywhere in the world, naturally the government’s interests are threatened by the one asset — gold & silver — that takes your money out of the digital financial system and beyond government control. Gold & silver are the ONE asset class this sits outside the financial system and is completely secure from government confiscation and global economic collapse. So when you keep some of your savings & retirement in physical gold & silver, you keep it out of government reach.

The Time to Act is Now

Gold & silver have been the best wealth protectors for over 5,000 years and have survived every government & currency collapse in history. But now the government threatens your ability to access gold & silver at a time in history when you most need it — a time when governments are going bankrupt and global banks teeter on the edge of total collapse. So the time to act is now.
Protect your savings & retirement with physical gold & silver while you can still get it… before you have nothing left to protect.
(Call (855) 335-7400 to receive your free copy of Damon Geller’s popular book, “Defend Your Money against Gov't Confiscation” AND your free Gold & Sliver guide, or fill in the form below)
signup_form_banner

Want Your Free Guides Faster?

Call (855) 335-7400

Want Your Free Guides Faster?

Call (855) 335-7400
BBB Logo

Saturday, September 24, 2016

Breaking: Guccifer 2.0 Releases More DNC Docs, Exposing More Corruption

Breaking: Guccifer 2.0 Releases More DNC Docs, Exposing More Corruption

New evidence proves Clinton was always the Democratic choice

Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton .
Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton. Photo: Justin Sullivan for Getty
On September 23, hacker Guccifer 2.0 released more documents obtained from the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC).
Last week, WikiLeaks directly released files from Guccifer 2.0 through their Twitter account. Among them was a high-profile donor list revealing the pay-to-play appointments of several ambassadorships and other positions by President Barack Obama. On September 15, Guccifer 2.0 released several DCCC memos on a WordPress site, including one from Ohio dated December 9, 2015 that referred to Hillary Clinton as the Democratic presidential nominee before the primaries began, even though Sen. Bernie Sanders was just a few points behind Clinton in most polls. “With former Governor Ted Strickland and Secretary Clinton on the ballot, there will be a boost from the top of the ticket,” read the memo.
Based on many similar memos and documents released by Guccifer 2.0 from the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and DCCC, it appears the Democratic Party leadership felt strangely self-assured Clinton would be their presidential nominee before a single vote was cast. The Clinton campaign and DNC have not disputed the veracity of any files or documents leaked, rather they have portrayed themselves as the victims of Russian hackers to divert attention from the content of the leaks.
Guccifer 2.0’s latest release includes a dossier file of DCCC Chair Ben Ray Lujan, a Democratic congressman from New Mexico. The extensive file includes hundreds of pages of statements, speeches, financial data and weak and strong points in anticipation of his re-election bid this November, and likely to prepare his political career for bigger ambitions. Among the weak points listed in the dossier is nepotism, as Ben Ray Lujan’s father, Ben Lujan Sr. was the Speaker of the New Mexico House of Representatives, and helped Lujan initially get elected to congress. Lujan’s cousin, Michelle Lujan Grisham, also serves in congress for a separate district in New Mexico.
One document provides talking points for Lujan to make a call to controversial New Jersey Democratic donor George Norcross in March 2015. “We need Mr. Norcross’ help in recruiting top targets such as State Sen. Van Drew, to run in NJ-2.  Ideally, he would call the recruits that we feel are the best and encourage them to run,” read the memo. “Likewise it would be ideal if he could mention his support when asked by others in his powerful circle. This will help to validate our candidates with the political and donor classes.” In a 2013 article, Philadelphia Magazine called Norcross “the man who destroyed democracy.” The DCCC memo reveals the Democratic Party has not only embraced wealthy donors influencing the political system but aggressively courts their input in pushing for their mutually preferred candidates.
Another memo dated April 2016 details a congressional race in Utah and notes, “Trump is extremely unpopular in Utah. Public polling has shown that Hillary Clinton could beat Trump in the very conservative state.” The memo provides further evidence the Democratic Party developed their short-term and long-term strategies with Clinton in mind as their nominee. Sanders wasn’t mentioned at all as a possible option or alternative; strategies incorporating him as the potential nominee were never discussed in these memos.

Thursday, September 22, 2016

Watch The Daily Show’s Trevor Noah Accidentally Destroy The Case For Gun Control


Watch The Daily Show’s Trevor Noah Accidentally Destroy The Case For Gun Control

Watch The Daily Show’s Trevor Noah Accidentally Destroy The Case For Gun Control


"Maybe he's onto something, because if you think about it, we've never tried that. We've never actually tried to repel terrorists with signs. Yeah, maybe that's all the airports need is a sign that says 'No Terrorists.'"
Trevor Noah, the host of Comedy Central’s The Daily Show, accidentally destroyed the case for gun control during his show on Wednesday night.
Noah’s accidental broadside against gun-free zones came during a portion of his opening monologue in which he made fun of a Minnesota man fed up with Islamic terrorism. The target of Noah’s ire was an ice cream shop owner in a small town southeast of St. Cloud, Minnesota — the site of a mass stabbing at a mall last weekend — who put up a sign outside of his restaurant that read, “Muslims Get Out.”
Noah mocked the store owner for a little bit, but then he moved on to the meat of his opening bit by mocking the man’s rationale for his “Muslims Get Out” sign:
You know what’s also strange is this man genuinely thought people who go around blowing people up would be stopped by a sign? You realize you’re talking to terrorists, not vampires. They don’t need to be invited in, alright? Or maybe he’s onto something, because if you think about it, we’ve never tried that. We’ve never actually tried to repel terrorists with signs. Yeah, maybe that’s all the airports need is a sign that says “No Terrorists,” yes? Yeah, and then guys are going to be walking going, “Oh, I was going to blow up the airport, but the rules are rules and they said I can’t come in. They said I can’t. They said I can’t come in.”

Does that argument sound familiar?
Noah probably doesn’t know it, but he just accidentally made an airtight case against gun-free zones in particular and gun control in general. He is 100 percent correct: people hell-bent on murdering as many people as possible don’t really care about silly signs or laws that tell them not to murder people. A sign that says “No Guns” will no more keep a violent jihadi from gunning down a bunch of innocent people than will a sign that says “Muslims Get Out.” And how do we know that gun-free zones, nearly always marked with signs designating them as such, don’t deter murderous psychopaths? Because mass shootings, rather than happening at gun ranges or in gun stores, keep happening in gun-free zones.
Contrary to Trevor Noah’s snarky assertion that “we’ve never tried to repel terrorists with signs,” our country has fecklessly tried for years to “repel terrorists with signs.”
The Sandy Hook massacre? Gun-free zone. Columbine? Gun-free zone. The Aurora movie theater shooting? Gun-free zone. The shooting last year at an Oregon community college? Gun-free zone. The shooting at a movie theater in Lafayette? Gun-free zone. The attack on a military recruiting center in Chattanooga? Gun-free zone. The Ft. Hood shooting? You guessed it: gun-free zone. The San Bernardino attack? Gun-free zone. And the massacre perpetrated by an ISIS enthusiast at an Orlando night club? Gun-free zone.
While Noah clearly doesn’t grasp the logical implications of his argument, his particular insight — that evil people who want to do evil things will find ways to carry out their schemes regardless of what signs you post or laws you pass — forms the foundation of the entire argument against gun control.
Bad people who want to murder you don’t care about your stupid signs and stupid laws.
New York City, for example, is a pressure cooker bomb-free zone. That mall in Minnesota was most definitely a weaponized knife-free zone. And yet… Terrorists don’t care that terrorism is illegal. They care about killing you. And they’ll kill you with whatever they can, whether it’s a gun, a knife, a pressure cooker, or a box cutter.
“Yeah, but this just proves we need to have stricter gun laws to prevent terrorists from getting guns in the first place,” Trevor Noah might respond. “Gun control is about more than just signs telling people not to do stuff.”
Except it’s not. The entire premise of gun control is that words on a piece of paper somewhere will prevent a terrorist from killing people. What is a law if not a sign that says what you’re allowed and not allowed to do? Yet time and time and time and time again, strict gun control regimes have completely failed to prevent mass murderers from committing mass murder. Chicago and Washington, D.C., have some of the strictest gun control laws in the nation, yet those laws have done little to stem the tide of gun crime in those cities.
As Trevor Noah demonstrated via his mockery of the Minnesota man with the “Muslims Get Out” sign at his restaurant, the logic of gun control that says signs forbidding bad stuff stops bad stuff from happening is nonsensical. “Words stop bad things from happening” is just dumb. A sign that says “Muslims Get Out” will do absolutely nothing to prevent radical Islamists from wreaking havoc. Trevor Noah understands this. If only he would learn to apply his logic to the argument from gun controllers that all we need to end violence are a few more signs telling terrorists not to use guns.

Wednesday, September 21, 2016

Government shouldn't seek to direct or control press coverage

Government shouldn't seek to direct or control press coverage


There’s a disturbing tendency in the Obama White House to lecture journalists on how to do their jobs. But if journalists only report what government officials wish them to report, and only when those officials deem it the proper time, then where’s the accountability. Here’s President Obama, on Monday, following terrorist bombings in New York and New Jersey.“I would ask that the press try to refrain from getting out ahead of the investigation,” Obama said in a press conference. He praised law enforcement, but scolded the media for concluding (from bombs going off) that bombs had gone off.“It does not help if false reports or incomplete information is out there,” he said.The irony here is that even as Obama spoke, reports were being confirmed that Ahmad Khan Rahami, the man allegedly responsible for the bombs, was in police custody following a shootout. Obama made no mention of that. Were reporters supposed to “refrain from getting out ahead” of the president on this important development?Then there’s Secretary of State John Kerry, who sees global warming as a bigger threat than ISIS.He says journalists shouldn’t cover terrorism, because it only serves to inform people.
“If you decide one day you’re going to be a terrorist and you’re willing to kill yourself, you can go out and kill some people,” he said. “You can make some noise... perhaps the media would do us all a service if they didn’t cover it quite as much. People wouldn’t know what’s going on.”
Yes, that’s the point.
Of course the administration would love to have greater control of what newspapers print and broadcasters say. The administration’s narrative is that terrorism is, in fact, a battle of narratives. Actual bombings disrupt that portrayal of things.
Yet a free press is a fundamental component of our system of government.
“The only security of all is in a free press,” Thomas Jefferson wrote to his friend the Marquis de Lafayette. “The force of public opinion cannot be resisted when permitted freely to be expressed. The agitation it produces must be submitted to. It is necessary, to keep the waters pure.”
He went on to tell John Jay, “Our liberty cannot be guarded but by the freedom of the press, nor that be limited without danger of losing it.”
That doesn’t mean Jefferson was always happy with the press; he excoriated the newspapers of the time - but never sought to limit them.
“Our printers raven on the agonies of their victims, as wolves do on the blood of the lamb,” he wrote to James Monroe.
Yet still, he said, “I am for freedom of the press, and against all violations of the Constitution to silence by force and not by reason the complaints or criticisms, just or unjust, of our citizens against the conduct of their agents.”
It’s not just the Obama administration, of course. Many levels of government would love to be their own watchdogs.
But that’s not how it works. The press must remain independent of the government it covers