Hillary Clinton’s email scandal is not going away. In fact, it just keeps getting worse for her as the case unfolds.
Most recently, it was revealed that the former Secretary of State had information on her private unsecured server that was so secret, lawyers involved in the case were not even allowed to go over the evidence without getting higher clearances.
That hasn’t stopped the army of Clinton supporters within the media from minimizing and rationalizing away the seriousness of the issue as well-respected legal scholars and judges continue to weigh in on the side that is calling for Hillary’s indictment.
Geraldo Rivera of Fox News is one of those who consistently defends Hillary on this issue. When he and Judge Jeanine Pirro appeared on ‘Fox & Friends’ recently, the two debated the issue.
Judge Pirro, demonstrating a superior knowledge of the law and this case in particular, completely destroyed Geraldo’s apologist stance with the facts.
When Geraldo accused the judge of playing politics, she responded, “She made Americans vulnerable because she had a non-secure server. This is about justice — this is about the law. This is about a woman who is not above the law even though she thinks she is.”
Do you think the Judge go it right on this one? Do Hillary deserve to be indicted for this?
Most recently, it was revealed that the former Secretary of State had information on her private unsecured server that was so secret, lawyers involved in the case were not even allowed to go over the evidence without getting higher clearances.
That hasn’t stopped the army of Clinton supporters within the media from minimizing and rationalizing away the seriousness of the issue as well-respected legal scholars and judges continue to weigh in on the side that is calling for Hillary’s indictment.
Geraldo Rivera of Fox News is one of those who consistently defends Hillary on this issue. When he and Judge Jeanine Pirro appeared on ‘Fox & Friends’ recently, the two debated the issue.
Judge Pirro, demonstrating a superior knowledge of the law and this case in particular, completely destroyed Geraldo’s apologist stance with the facts.
When Geraldo accused the judge of playing politics, she responded, “She made Americans vulnerable because she had a non-secure server. This is about justice — this is about the law. This is about a woman who is not above the law even though she thinks she is.”
Do you think the Judge go it right on this one? Do Hillary deserve to be indicted for this?
No comments:
Post a Comment