PETITION URGING SPECIAL PROSECUTOR TO INVESTIGATE HILLARY CLINTON'S CRIMES

Published: 6 days ago 7332 others have already signed this petition. Sign now to show your support!






       PETITION 
URGING DONALD TRUMP, IF ELECTED PRESIDENT, TO APPOINT A SPECIAL 
PROSECUTOR TO INVESTIGATE HILLARY CLINTON FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE 
ESPIONAGE ACT – AND URGING CONGRESS TO HOLD HER IN CONTEMPT FOR 
DESTROYING OVER 30,000 EMAIL DOCUMENTS AFTER THEY WERE SUBPOENAED



Whereas, Donald Trump, during the second 
presidential debate on Oct. 9, said to Hillary Clinton, "If I win, I am 
going to instruct my attorney general to get a special prosecutor to 
look into your situation, because there has never been so many lies, so 
much deception. There has never been anything like it, and we’re going 
to have a special prosecutor";  

Whereas, Trump added that not only are Americans 
"furious" over Clinton's crimes, but the FBI as well, stating, "In my 
opinion, the people that have been long-time workers at the FBI are 
furious. There has never been anything like this, where … you get a 
subpoena, and after getting the subpoena you delete 33,000 emails and 
then you acid wash them or bleach them ... So we’re going to get a 
special prosecutor and we’re going to look into it";

Whereas, even the left-leaning PolitiFact website 
confirms 33,000 emails were indeed deleted from Hillary's unsecure 
private server three weeks after she received a congressional 
subpoena demanding the production of her emails – an act that normally 
would result in being held in contempt of Congress;  

Whereas, news reports confirm that "FBI agents are 
ready to revolt" over Director James Comey's "cowardly" whitewash of 
Hillary Clinton’s long-term mishandling of classified information using 
an unauthorized private email server, with Dennis V. Hughes, former 
chief of the FBI’s computer investigations unit, saying, "The FBI has 
politicized itself and its reputation will suffer for a long time – I 
hold Director Comey responsible,” and retired FBI agent Michael M. 
Biasello adding, "Comey has singlehandedly ruined the reputation of the 
organization";


Whereas, fully 56 percent of Americans, including 
many Democrats, say FBI Director James Comey should have recommended 
that Hillary Clinton be indicted over her intentional mishandling of 
classified emails while secretary of state, according to an ABC 
News/Washington Post survey;

Whereas, legal expert Judge Andrew Napolitano says, 
"the evidence of her guilt is overwhelming" and that "it was obviously a
 policy decision by the White House not to investigate her," and 
moreover agrees that Trump, as president, "could have his own attorney 
general reopen the investigation and assign a new team of people to 
examine the same evidence" – that is, Trump could have the Justice 
Department reopen the closed investigation into Clinton's private email 
server, even without appointing a special prosecutor; 

Whereas, when during the second debate Hillary 
Clinton's said it was "awfully good that someone with the temperament of
 Donald Trump is not in charge of the law in our country," Trump 
quipped, "… because you’d be in jail";

Whereas, in response, the left has hysterically 
complained that "threatening to jail a political opponent is 
anti-democratic and anti-American," with leftwing Harvard law professor 
Lawrence Tribe (who in 2008 was a judicial adviser to the Obama 
presidential campaign) claiming, "some of the political leaders who’ve 
jailed their political opponents have been Hugo Chávez, Recep Erdoğan, 
Robert Mugabe, Manuel Noriega, Augusto Pinochet and, of course, Vladimir
 Putin"; 

Whereas, Trump obviously did not threaten to 
investigate Clinton because she is a political opponent, but because she
 has blatantly violated U.S. espionage laws, mishandled top-secret 
information, destroyed government files and obstructed justice – 
criminal misconduct that has nothing to do with being a political 
adversary of Trump’s;

Whereas, it is, in reality, Democrats, not 
Republicans, who routinely target political adversaries for prison – 
such as the Obama administration's criminal prosecution of high-profile 
Obama critic Dinesh D’Souza (for which the Justice Department demanded a
 severe jail sentence, which the judge declined to impose) for a 
campaign-finance violation of the petty sort that the DOJ routinely 
allows to be settled by a civil fine; also Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, 
producer of the anti-Muslim video the Obama administration falsely and 
scandalously blamed for the Benghazi massacre, was subjected to a 
scapegoat prosecution and imprisonment (under the guise of a 
supervised-release violation) intended to bolster Obama and Clinton's 
shameful "blame the video" narrative; 

Whereas, Barack Obama, when running for president in
 2008, promised an investigation of the Bush administration’s 
waterboarding (which Obama and the left insist on referring to as 
"torture") of a total of three terrorists, including 9/11 mastermind 
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. As Obama said in April 2008: "What I would want 
to do is to have my Justice Department and my attorney general 
immediately review the information that’s already there and to find out 
are there inquiries that need to be pursued. … If crimes have been 
committed, they should be investigated";

Whereas, many Americans have been convicted and 
imprisoned for violations of the same federal statutes Hillary Clinton 
has far more egregiously violated – or as Trump put it during the second
 debate, many people's "lives have been destroyed for doing one-fifth of
 what you have done. And it’s a disgrace, and honestly, you ought to be 
ashamed of yourself";

Whereas, despite the ludicrously biased behavior of 
the establishment news media on behalf of Clinton's candidacy, tens of 
millions of honest, hardworking, law-abiding, patriotic Americans – or 
as Hillary Clinton describes them, "deplorables" – know full well that 
Bill and Hillary Clinton have a long, sordid history of crimes and 
corruption, for which they have escaped consequence and prosecution 
decade after decade – and they are, as Trump rightly said, "furious" 
over it: 

SIGN THE PETITION

Therefore, we hereby add our names to this petition 
calling on Congress to hold Hillary Clinton in contempt of Congress for 
purposely destroying evidence three weeks after it was subpoenaed, and 
we likewise encourage Donald J. Trump, if he is elected president, to 
appoint a special prosecutor to conduct a complete and fair 
investigation – one not compromised by craven political loyalties – into
 Hillary Clinton's egregious abuse of America's state secrets.

One of America's core principles, first expressed by President John 
Adams, is that ours is "a government of laws, and not of men." In plain 
language, America is not a monarchy and no one is above the law –
 not even the Clintons. Holding Hillary Clinton legally accountable, at 
long last, for at least some of her many criminal misdeeds by applying 
the same legal standard to them as to any other citizen would go a long 
way toward restoring citizens' flagging faith in America as a just, 
moral and great nation.



THIS MAY BE AMERICA’S LAST CHANCE TO DEMONSTRATE WE ARE TRULY A NATION WITH EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER THE LAW!