I just seen on the news where 2 white kids, early twenties looked like, was sentenced to 20 years in prison for flying the Confederate battle flag. Charged under a law that was meant to target gang activities. They are not members of any street gang nor any other type of club or group. This is BULLSHIT. what about the Constitutional law against excessive punishment for a crime, and WHAT CRIME WAS COMMITTED ?? Whether you support the flying of the Confederate battle flag or not it is protected under our FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND RIGHT TO ASSEMBLE. The judge that handed this sentence down should be sent to PRISON for crimes against the Constitution. Rioters and looters burn our cities and police cars to the ground and get away with it with no charges of any kind. WTF has happened here, somebody has got to STOP SHIT LIKE THIS! Child molesters, rapist and murderers get less time in prison for their TRUE CRIMES then this....5 pickup trucks riding around flying the Confederate battle flag IS NOT A CRIME . These kids fell out crying in tears and sobs when the dumb ass judge handed this sentence down, they are not criminal's or gang members, THIS COULD JUST AS EASILY BEEN YOUR KIDS SENT TO 20 YEARS IN PRISON FOR FLYING A TEXAS FLAG OR A MALCOLM X FLAG OR ANY OTHER SYMBOL THAT THEY HAVE THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO SUPPORT. This judge needs to be REMOVED from holding office or law license of any type. The same for the prosecutor in the case, this is nothing but out right ass kissing the liberals, MAYBE PRESIDENT TRUMP CAN STEP IN AND HELP with a pardon, hell obama handed out more pardons than any other President ever has, SOMEBODY HAS GOT TO STEP IN AND HELP THESE KIDS NOW. This boy and girl are not criminals but after 20 years in prison they will damn sure be criminals when they get out!
Tuesday, February 28, 2017
Saturday, February 25, 2017
Decision On Remington Lawsuit Pending
Decision On Remington Lawsuit Pending
This is one of those cases where it’s hard to trust the media, due to the fact that they utterly hate all firearms manufacturers, but there is evidence indicating that some triggers are in fact defective. The scope of the problem is up for debate, but it’s hard to argue that the trigger system at issue is a good one.
Here’s the low-down on the case.
While the media has been using the case to paint the entire firearms industry as evil, it may actually be the case that some triggers are in fact defective.U.S. District Judge Ortrie Smith of Kansas City said he’ll decide within 30 days whether to accept the settlement affecting 7.5 million Remington rifles.
Under the settlement, the company has offered to replace the trigger mechanism on most of its popular Model 700 rifles – if the owners ask for the retrofit.
But a Montana man who’s been fighting 16 years for a recall of the rifles, saying the trigger mechanism is defective and that Remington knew about it, has urged the judge to reject the settlement – as have attorneys general from nine states and the District of Columbia.
Richard Barber of Willow Creek, whose 9-year-old son, Gus, was killed in 2000 by a Model 700 rifle that fired without the trigger being pulled, during a family hunting trip, has filed objections to the settlement.
Barber says Remington should not be allowed to continue to say nothing is wrong with the rifles – a statement he says discourages gun owners from getting the defective product fixed.
At a hearing earlier this week, Judge Smith also noted that in the two years since the settlement was announced, only 22,000 rifle owners have filed claims – a claims rate of 0.29 percent.
CNBC reported that Smith said he’s concerned about the “exceedingly small” number of claims, because it seems “inconceivable to me that someone would have a firearm that might injure a loved one and not have it fixed.”
Barber also has said Remington should replace the trigger mechanisms on older Model 600 rifles, instead of offering only a $12.50 voucher for Remington products, as part of the settlement.
If Smith rejects the settlement, the case could go to trial.
Remington agreed to the settlement, but has continued to say publicly that nothing is wrong with its popular Model 700 and other 700-series bolt-action rifles. The settlement also covers some Model 600 rifles, the Seven, the Sportsman 78 and XP-100.
If this judge rejects the settlement, it’s going to cost Remington a small fortune. However, ironically it may actually benefit the firearms industry if Remington gets hit hard financially over this lawsuit. That’s because gun control advocates would love to use this case to try to push new laws about manufacturer liability. If the existing laws work the way they are supposed to, progressives will have a tough time demanding new laws.
Sunday, February 12, 2017
Insurrection!
These are the same Globalists that overthrew the Ukraine, Egypt, Libya and Syria. The Globalists are intent on World domination. They are the 4th Reich. They are Fascists and White Supremacists that wish to dominate over people of color or eliminate them altogether. They already own most of the World’s wealth and resources and they want the rest. They do not care what your individual or group politics are as long as you are willing to take the fight to the new administration. They must end the Trump administration before the administration unwinds the Globalist’s control of our nation and our military.
Globalist Influence over U.S. Social and Political Movements (click here for a hi resolution image)
The RefuseFascism movement – A Clever Cloaking of the Revolutionary Communist Party
Antifaschistische Aktion was proclaimed by the German Communist Party (KPD) in their newspaper Rote Fahne in 1932
The first movement to call itself Antifaschistische Aktion was proclaimed by the German Communist Party (KPD) in their newspaper Rote Fahne in 1932 and had its first rally in Berlin 10 July 1932. In May 1932 the communist paramilitary organisation Rotfrontkämpferbund had been banned and after a fight between Nazi and Communist members of parliament the Antifaschistische Aktion was created to ensure that the communists could have a militant organization to rival the paramilitary organizations of the Nazis. Today, these “antifascists” think they are fighting NAZIs and white supremacists and until recently, many of them were. Relying on “fake news” from a myriad of sources, they have been brain-washed into supporting the rise of a 4th Reich, the very organization they are sworn to oppose. They too will be cast aside the moment this battle is won or lost.
If you are an anti-capitalist, a Global Warming adherent, a supporter of the occupy movement, a protester at Standing Rock or even a promoter of the Black Lives Matter movement, you too have been or will soon be enlisted to fight the Globalist war against the new administration.
Each
and every one of you is motivated by a cause that you genuinely believe
in. What you don’t seem to recognize is that the recent momentum you
have gained is a direct result of forced propaganda and financing from
the true NAZIs, the Globalists that are intent on not only controlling
the United States, but using our military might to dominate the World.
What you don’t seem to comprehend is that you are cannon fodder. You are
being used and exploited. You are the useful idiots of a 4th Reich that
was so close to their goal of World domination
before the most recent election threatened to unwind all of the
Globalist accomplishments. Every President since the assassination of
JFK has either been on the Globalist payroll or has obliged their
demands with the sole exception of Ronald Reagan.
Kennedy
and Reagan both resisted the Globalist agenda. Both were stopped with
bullets. While Reagan was not killed, his fight against the Globalists
ended 69 days into his presidency with a bullet that almost killed him.“If you are out there on the street engaged in violence against the current administration, you are no better than the gunman that shot President Kennedy. This gunman believed he was doing it for his cause. He too was a useful idiot for the Globalists.” – NavyJackNow I have no problem with protesters using peaceful and legal means to promote a cause or right a wrong. I despise identity politics, racism and real fascists as much or more than any of you. Get out there and protest. The people that are telling you that protests are not enough; they are the enemy of the people of the United States and of all people of color throughout the World. The people and organizations that are inciting riots, encouraging property destruction and violence are blind to the Globalist agenda. If you are one of them, you are helping the Globalists attempt to restore their control of our nation and our military. These Globalists have no ethical limits. They are NAZIs and they are using you to achieve their goal. They are using you to enslave people of color, control all wealth and eliminate opposition. Do not be the person that killed President Kennedy. Stop this madness before the real anti-fascists, those who oppose the Globalist agenda, are forced to stop you.
Additional References:
- Operation HYPO After Action Report: Infiltrating Violent Protest Organizations
- President Trump Visits Philadelphia: Anarchist Plot Foiled
- Oath Keepers at the Inauguration
- The Presidential Inauguration (or not) of Donald J. Trump
- Communists Intend to Overthrow the United States before Inauguration Day
- Is Donald Trump’s Presidency a Clear and Present Danger?
- #DisruptJ20 Threatens the Presidential Inauguration Ceremony
- Rejecting Identity Politics to Achieve Rightful Liberty
- Treasonous Conspiracies Againstthe Government of the United States of America
- Operation HYPO: Infiltrating Violent Protests Against the President Elect
- BATTLEGROUND AMERICA
- Rejecting Identity Politics to Achieve Rightful Liberty
Wednesday, February 8, 2017
Trump proven right: Media spinning terror stories
President Donald Trump has been severely critical of the news media
for doing what he called a poor job of covering instances of Islamic
terrorism not only in the U.S. but around the world.
The White House released a list
late Monday of 20 terrorist attacks “executed or inspired” by ISIS,
many of which Trump spokesman Sean Spicer said were not give sufficient
coverage by the national media.
“You have seen what happened in Paris and Nice. All over Europe, it’s happening,” Trump told military leaders at the U.S. Central Command. “It’s gotten to a point where it’s not even being reported. And in many cases, the very, very dishonest press doesn’t want to report it. They have their reasons, and you understand that.”
One of the first news agencies to counter Trump’s allegations was the BBC, which on Tuesday ran a compilation of all its stories about the terrorist events on the administration’s list.
But as many terrorism experts told WND, it’s not the amount of coverage given to a specific event that counts but rather the type of coverage.
A classic example of that can be found by comparing and contrasting the coverage that two news agencies – WND and the BBC – gave to a brutal machete attack at the Nazareth Mediterranean Restaurant one year ago in February 2016 that left four patrons wounded, one critically.
In the BBC story, there is no mention of the words Islam, jihad, Muslim, refugee or immigrant. Every one of those words applied to the attacker, Mohamed Barry, who was a Muslim immigrant from the West African country of Guinea, as pointed out in the WND story.
“Trump is absolutely correct. The point is not that they ignore the stories, but they deliberately conceal and/or misrepresent the aspects of them that make it clear that they’re Islamic jihad attacks,” said Robert Spencer, editor of Jihad Watch.
One notorious example of this is the Orlando massacre, Spencer said.
“Mainstream news outlets claimed that he was a conflicted gay man lashing out at other gays,” he said. “This was outright disinformation: The FBI later announced that there was no evidence that he was gay, no gay apps on his phone, etc. Few outlets published his actual remarks, making it clear that he was killing for ISIS and Islam. The coverage of terrorist incidents in general in the establishment media deliberately misleads the public.”
One terrorist event not included on the White House list was the Chattanooga shooting in which Mohammad Abdulazeez killed five unarmed U.S. servicemen at a Navy recruiting center in July 2015. It took five months for the Obama Justice Department to declare the attack was an act of terrorism, and very little mainstream reporting was done to keep the attack in the national spotlight during those five months of silence by the DOJ. In other words, no pressure was placed on the administration to admit the obvious terrorism connections while the attack was still fresh in the minds of the news-consuming public.
Then came the University of California at Merced knife attack in
November 2015 by a student there, Faisal Mohamed, whose parents
emigrated to the U.S. from Pakistan.
The BBC did not report on the obvious jihadist markings in the attack, which wounded four people and would have been worse if a brave construction worker and officer had not intervened. The FBI waited four months to declare the attack an act of terrorism, disclosing that Mohamed had links to ISIS and had visited radical websites. Many national news agencies never covered the original attack. The BBC published a brief article on the incident after the FBI report came out, but by that time few Americans were paying attention. At least the BBC covered the FBI’s belated findings. Most establishment media companies did not.
The British-based BBC often provides more coverage of terrorist
attacks than its U.S. counterparts, ABC, CBS and NBC, said Phillip
Haney, retired Homeland Security officer who for more than 13 years
screen immigrants and refugees for connections to terrorism.
“Let’s say that in terms of scope of coverage the BBC is actually correct that they were ahead of the others,” Haney told WND. “Even with the broader scope of coverage the BBC, as deficient as it is, it’s still better than the American journalistic coverage. During my time on the inside with DHS, it seemed like the Daily Mail, another British news outlet, would always come out with information within minutes if not hours, well ahead of American media, so why do we have to look into foreign media sources to find pieces of the story that you won’t find here?”
Get the book former Minnesota Congresswoman Michele Bachmann is calling the “most important read of 2017.” It’s “Stealth Invasion: Muslim Conquest Through Immigration and Resettlement Jihad” in which investigative reporter Leo Hohmann blows the lid off of the dark side of refugee resettlement.
When it came to the San Bernardino attack by Syed Farook and his immigrant wife, Tashfeen Malik, the BBC, like CNN and most of the other establishment media outlets, covered the story predominantly within the leftist meme of “gun violence,” glossing over or ignoring the more pertinent theme of Islamic jihad. The BBC, in its report Tuesday, linked back to its San Bernardino coverage, which included a major sidebar linking and comparing the San Bernardino event to other stories about “gun violence.”
It’s exactly this type of broad contextual reporting, which the media are so good at when it comes to “gun violence,” that critics say is missing on the topic of Islamic terrorism.
An example of this came on Nov. 28, 2016, when a Somali refugee and student at Ohio State University goaded fellow students to exit a science building by pulling the fire alarm. Then he rammed his vehicle into them, got out and stabbed as many as possible. He injured 11 before he was shot dead by police. The obvious similarity of this attack and another just two months earlier in St. Cloud, Minnesota, were striking. Both attacks were carried out by a Somali Muslim refugee, both using knives against a civilian soft target. Yet almost none of the reporting by the mainstream media drew the parallels.
Rather, the BBC’s main article detailing the attack in San Bernardino on Dec. 11, 2015, starts out like a story about a “mass shooting” crime, not an Islamic jihadist attack. The word “Islam” does not even appear until the eighth paragraph.
The fact that Farook had recently traveled to Saudi Arabia was not mentioned until the 10th graph.
In the 14th graph, we find out that Farook and Malik had been “radicalized” for some time, but the BBC fails to inform its readers how or by whom this “radicalization” occurred. Do Muslims just wake up one day and decide to kill? Where does this inspiration come from? Silence on that issue is the unwritten code of conduct for mainstream news reporters.
And here’s the kicker. The reader must continue reading down to the 21st paragraph to find where the BBC has buried the most important news information. It is here that readers are finally told:
“U.S. officials have told the media Tashfeen Malik pledged allegiance to the leader of the Islamic State (IS) group on Facebook.”
Readers further learn that the U.S. government “did not pick up on extremist messages posted online when Farook and his wife began chatting.”
Haney, co-author of the book “See Something Say Nothing,” said it’s the point of emphasis that counts, not the volume of coverage.
“Look at what they choose to emphasize. It’s obvious the way they lay out the article on San Bernardino that they don’t really want to emphasize the Islamic aspect of the story,” he says. “Why didn’t they just put all that factual information into two or three paragraphs at the very beginning?”
As a former counter-terrorism officer at Customs and Border Patrol in DHS, Haney was involved in many of the cases on the White House list.
“I was there for the Boston bombing, Chattanooga shooting, Fort Hood massacre, Time Square bomber, and I saw the way these stories were reported,” he said.
He said it took him 10 minutes using open sources on his laptop to connect Orlando shooter Omar Mateen to a mosque in Fort Pierce, Florida, which has ties to the extremist group Tabliqui Jumaat.
Haney said the idea of “self radicalization” popularized in the U.S. media is largely a myth.
“I definitely agree with what Trump said, because I saw it first hand. I saw the way the coverage of these events was skewed by the ‘countering violent extremism’ narrative and the prevailing tendency to initially report that there was no link between mainstream Islam and terrorism,” he said.
And whenever someone in Congress wanted to get serious about Islamic terrorism, they were brutalized in the media, Haney said.
He cites the case of Michele Bachmann, Louie Gohmert and several other members of Congress who wanted to investigate the Muslim Brotherhood’s infiltration of the Obama administration in 2012.
“The way they covered that story, they reacted with the same level of political hysteria as they did when Trump issued his executive order temporarily banning travel from seven countries,” Haney said. “Mike Rogers [former Michigan GOP congressman], John Boehner [former House Speaker] and Sen. John McCain attacked the five members of Congress with hysterical fury. They were conspiracy theorists, they were biased, they were Islamophobic, racist, unnecessarily targeting wonderful people like Huma Abedin. And it was widely covered that way by the mainstream media. There was never any analytic, thoughtful, step-by-step reporting, I wonder if it is true, could it be true, and what is it the inspector general’s role to investigate?”
By contrast, Haney points to how quickly the inspector general lurched into action when Trump implemented his executive order.
“Within a day or two of the order being implemented, the inspector general launched an investigation,” he said. “Whereas, in 2012, they couldn’t find the wherewithal to inspect five members of Congress alleging deep involvement of the Muslim Brotherhood in the Obama administration. So, Trump is right; they are biased. The other thing they always say is, ‘Let’s be careful not to jump to any hasty conclusions,’ and then that’s it, they leave you hanging. And by the time they revisit the story, you forget what the plot of the movie has been and what you were watching to begin with.”
A familiar pattern
Whether it was San Bernardino, Chattanooga, Columbus or Orlando, Haney says the “automatic, reflexive response, by the media was to say, ‘We don’t have any evidence of a foreign terrorist link,’ or they say upfront it is linked to ISIS, which allows people to come to a false conclusion, that there is either no foreign link to terrorism or it’s just those ISIS guys, so we must be OK because it’s just some kooks who got radicalized on the Internet and got affiliated with this nasty group called ISIS.”
The media over the last eight years have increasingly considered off limits any reporting on mosques and their involvement in terrorism.
“The radical message, it’s often affirmed here in the mosques. That’s the big question that is never asked or investigated, that maybe some of the mosques right here in the United States are really the source of some of the so-called radicalization,” Haney said. “That is the danger. Trump is right. He’s not always eloquent in the way he says it, but he’s right.”
Get the book former Minnesota Congresswoman Michele Bachmann is calling the “most important read of 2017.” It’s “Stealth Invasion: Muslim Conquest Through Immigration and Resettlement Jihad” in which investigative reporter Leo Hohmann blows the lid off of the dark side of refugee resettlement.
Below is the White House list of terror attacks it said were planned or inspired by ISIS.
“You have seen what happened in Paris and Nice. All over Europe, it’s happening,” Trump told military leaders at the U.S. Central Command. “It’s gotten to a point where it’s not even being reported. And in many cases, the very, very dishonest press doesn’t want to report it. They have their reasons, and you understand that.”
One of the first news agencies to counter Trump’s allegations was the BBC, which on Tuesday ran a compilation of all its stories about the terrorist events on the administration’s list.
But as many terrorism experts told WND, it’s not the amount of coverage given to a specific event that counts but rather the type of coverage.
A classic example of that can be found by comparing and contrasting the coverage that two news agencies – WND and the BBC – gave to a brutal machete attack at the Nazareth Mediterranean Restaurant one year ago in February 2016 that left four patrons wounded, one critically.
In the BBC story, there is no mention of the words Islam, jihad, Muslim, refugee or immigrant. Every one of those words applied to the attacker, Mohamed Barry, who was a Muslim immigrant from the West African country of Guinea, as pointed out in the WND story.
“Trump is absolutely correct. The point is not that they ignore the stories, but they deliberately conceal and/or misrepresent the aspects of them that make it clear that they’re Islamic jihad attacks,” said Robert Spencer, editor of Jihad Watch.
One notorious example of this is the Orlando massacre, Spencer said.
“Mainstream news outlets claimed that he was a conflicted gay man lashing out at other gays,” he said. “This was outright disinformation: The FBI later announced that there was no evidence that he was gay, no gay apps on his phone, etc. Few outlets published his actual remarks, making it clear that he was killing for ISIS and Islam. The coverage of terrorist incidents in general in the establishment media deliberately misleads the public.”
One terrorist event not included on the White House list was the Chattanooga shooting in which Mohammad Abdulazeez killed five unarmed U.S. servicemen at a Navy recruiting center in July 2015. It took five months for the Obama Justice Department to declare the attack was an act of terrorism, and very little mainstream reporting was done to keep the attack in the national spotlight during those five months of silence by the DOJ. In other words, no pressure was placed on the administration to admit the obvious terrorism connections while the attack was still fresh in the minds of the news-consuming public.
Muhammad Youssef Abdulazeez (Photo: Fox News screenshot)
The BBC did not report on the obvious jihadist markings in the attack, which wounded four people and would have been worse if a brave construction worker and officer had not intervened. The FBI waited four months to declare the attack an act of terrorism, disclosing that Mohamed had links to ISIS and had visited radical websites. Many national news agencies never covered the original attack. The BBC published a brief article on the incident after the FBI report came out, but by that time few Americans were paying attention. At least the BBC covered the FBI’s belated findings. Most establishment media companies did not.
Faisal Mohammad was an 18-year-old student at UC-Merced.
“Let’s say that in terms of scope of coverage the BBC is actually correct that they were ahead of the others,” Haney told WND. “Even with the broader scope of coverage the BBC, as deficient as it is, it’s still better than the American journalistic coverage. During my time on the inside with DHS, it seemed like the Daily Mail, another British news outlet, would always come out with information within minutes if not hours, well ahead of American media, so why do we have to look into foreign media sources to find pieces of the story that you won’t find here?”
Get the book former Minnesota Congresswoman Michele Bachmann is calling the “most important read of 2017.” It’s “Stealth Invasion: Muslim Conquest Through Immigration and Resettlement Jihad” in which investigative reporter Leo Hohmann blows the lid off of the dark side of refugee resettlement.
When it came to the San Bernardino attack by Syed Farook and his immigrant wife, Tashfeen Malik, the BBC, like CNN and most of the other establishment media outlets, covered the story predominantly within the leftist meme of “gun violence,” glossing over or ignoring the more pertinent theme of Islamic jihad. The BBC, in its report Tuesday, linked back to its San Bernardino coverage, which included a major sidebar linking and comparing the San Bernardino event to other stories about “gun violence.”
It’s exactly this type of broad contextual reporting, which the media are so good at when it comes to “gun violence,” that critics say is missing on the topic of Islamic terrorism.
An example of this came on Nov. 28, 2016, when a Somali refugee and student at Ohio State University goaded fellow students to exit a science building by pulling the fire alarm. Then he rammed his vehicle into them, got out and stabbed as many as possible. He injured 11 before he was shot dead by police. The obvious similarity of this attack and another just two months earlier in St. Cloud, Minnesota, were striking. Both attacks were carried out by a Somali Muslim refugee, both using knives against a civilian soft target. Yet almost none of the reporting by the mainstream media drew the parallels.
Rather, the BBC’s main article detailing the attack in San Bernardino on Dec. 11, 2015, starts out like a story about a “mass shooting” crime, not an Islamic jihadist attack. The word “Islam” does not even appear until the eighth paragraph.
The fact that Farook had recently traveled to Saudi Arabia was not mentioned until the 10th graph.
In the 14th graph, we find out that Farook and Malik had been “radicalized” for some time, but the BBC fails to inform its readers how or by whom this “radicalization” occurred. Do Muslims just wake up one day and decide to kill? Where does this inspiration come from? Silence on that issue is the unwritten code of conduct for mainstream news reporters.
And here’s the kicker. The reader must continue reading down to the 21st paragraph to find where the BBC has buried the most important news information. It is here that readers are finally told:
“U.S. officials have told the media Tashfeen Malik pledged allegiance to the leader of the Islamic State (IS) group on Facebook.”
Readers further learn that the U.S. government “did not pick up on extremist messages posted online when Farook and his wife began chatting.”
Haney, co-author of the book “See Something Say Nothing,” said it’s the point of emphasis that counts, not the volume of coverage.
“Look at what they choose to emphasize. It’s obvious the way they lay out the article on San Bernardino that they don’t really want to emphasize the Islamic aspect of the story,” he says. “Why didn’t they just put all that factual information into two or three paragraphs at the very beginning?”
As a former counter-terrorism officer at Customs and Border Patrol in DHS, Haney was involved in many of the cases on the White House list.
“I was there for the Boston bombing, Chattanooga shooting, Fort Hood massacre, Time Square bomber, and I saw the way these stories were reported,” he said.
He said it took him 10 minutes using open sources on his laptop to connect Orlando shooter Omar Mateen to a mosque in Fort Pierce, Florida, which has ties to the extremist group Tabliqui Jumaat.
Haney said the idea of “self radicalization” popularized in the U.S. media is largely a myth.
“I definitely agree with what Trump said, because I saw it first hand. I saw the way the coverage of these events was skewed by the ‘countering violent extremism’ narrative and the prevailing tendency to initially report that there was no link between mainstream Islam and terrorism,” he said.
And whenever someone in Congress wanted to get serious about Islamic terrorism, they were brutalized in the media, Haney said.
He cites the case of Michele Bachmann, Louie Gohmert and several other members of Congress who wanted to investigate the Muslim Brotherhood’s infiltration of the Obama administration in 2012.
“The way they covered that story, they reacted with the same level of political hysteria as they did when Trump issued his executive order temporarily banning travel from seven countries,” Haney said. “Mike Rogers [former Michigan GOP congressman], John Boehner [former House Speaker] and Sen. John McCain attacked the five members of Congress with hysterical fury. They were conspiracy theorists, they were biased, they were Islamophobic, racist, unnecessarily targeting wonderful people like Huma Abedin. And it was widely covered that way by the mainstream media. There was never any analytic, thoughtful, step-by-step reporting, I wonder if it is true, could it be true, and what is it the inspector general’s role to investigate?”
By contrast, Haney points to how quickly the inspector general lurched into action when Trump implemented his executive order.
“Within a day or two of the order being implemented, the inspector general launched an investigation,” he said. “Whereas, in 2012, they couldn’t find the wherewithal to inspect five members of Congress alleging deep involvement of the Muslim Brotherhood in the Obama administration. So, Trump is right; they are biased. The other thing they always say is, ‘Let’s be careful not to jump to any hasty conclusions,’ and then that’s it, they leave you hanging. And by the time they revisit the story, you forget what the plot of the movie has been and what you were watching to begin with.”
A familiar pattern
Whether it was San Bernardino, Chattanooga, Columbus or Orlando, Haney says the “automatic, reflexive response, by the media was to say, ‘We don’t have any evidence of a foreign terrorist link,’ or they say upfront it is linked to ISIS, which allows people to come to a false conclusion, that there is either no foreign link to terrorism or it’s just those ISIS guys, so we must be OK because it’s just some kooks who got radicalized on the Internet and got affiliated with this nasty group called ISIS.”
The media over the last eight years have increasingly considered off limits any reporting on mosques and their involvement in terrorism.
“The radical message, it’s often affirmed here in the mosques. That’s the big question that is never asked or investigated, that maybe some of the mosques right here in the United States are really the source of some of the so-called radicalization,” Haney said. “That is the danger. Trump is right. He’s not always eloquent in the way he says it, but he’s right.”
Get the book former Minnesota Congresswoman Michele Bachmann is calling the “most important read of 2017.” It’s “Stealth Invasion: Muslim Conquest Through Immigration and Resettlement Jihad” in which investigative reporter Leo Hohmann blows the lid off of the dark side of refugee resettlement.
Below is the White House list of terror attacks it said were planned or inspired by ISIS.
Patrick Kelly I
did not write this but PLEASE READ....From the eyes/experience of a
soldier - Afghanistan & Iraq. We in the United States know
nothing.....I was asked to share this by the author: I don't typically
go on rants or express my political beliefs here, but
I just have to get this off my mind. As some of you know, I'm active
duty Army. Aside from that, I am a medic. I've spent 3 years of my life
overseas in both Afghanistan and Iraq. I've seen some pretty atrocious
sites caused by war, from both sides. I've picked up blown up body parts
of friends and I've saved the lives of guys who were trying to kill me
and my guys right before I was keeping them from their 72 virgins or
whatever they believe awaits them on the other side. Here is an unbiased
truthful view to the Syrian refugee situation. My first deployment to
Iraq, in 2006, my unit voluntarily ran a childrens burn clinic outside
of the FOB. It was a constant target for attacks. You would think that
people wouldn't shoot mortars or rockets at their own children, but you
would be wrong. We saw hundreds of children, from infants to 18 year
olds. The overwhelming majority of the kids we saw (90% or better) were
clear cases of abuse. These parents were literally dunking their kids in
boiling water, or throwing hot chai at their kids faces... Yes, we're
talking about babies, toddlers, kids not even old enough to understand
why their parents would do these things to them. HUNDREDS of kids... We
saw quite a few of these kids that were sexually abused, both girls and
boys. Their parents acted if nothing was wrong with this, even when
confronted by our doctors. This is the mentality of their society, not
the viewpoint of a few individuals... these beliefs have been accepted
to the vast majority of these people. Many were educated, well dressed,
well spoken men, but yet, they still raped their own children, and kept
chai boys (if you don't know what that means, google it.) During that
deployment, we also captured the 3rd largest EFP cache that had ever
been captured. There were hundreds of copper plates, homemade
explosives, fake curbs to house the EFP's, hundreds of mortars and
rockets and howitzer rounds, even an anti-aircraft gun. All of these
things came from one place, Syria. Almost every single IED or EFP we
found or hit could be traced back to Syria... A lot of the terrorists we
captured were from SYRIA... Imagine that. Fast forward a couple years,
and I find myself in Helmand Province, in Afghanistan... We had a group
of Afghani's that were paid to help guard our little mud hut in the
middle of an Afghan village (I wasn't on a fob) These guys also kept a
"chai boy" A boy, about 11 years old, who was there to serve these guys
sexually. We heard him being sexually assaulted many times, but there
was nothing we could do about it. We asked the police, the Afghan Army,
and we were told the same thing every time.... it's their culture, and
accepted as the norm.... Once again, we captured Syrian made explosives,
weapons, and other items... We found Syrian passports during raids...
And people out there want us to let these people into the US, with our
kids, and near our wives. Near our schools, near our churches,
synogogues, malls. Places where we should never have to fear being blown
up, shot, kidnapped and tortured... Don't forget what they did to the
Egyptian Coptic Christians, or the Jordanian pilot... Don't forget about
what they do to rape victims! They stone these women to death for being
raped! They behead their own people. Do you think they will show mercy
to you? Look at the rape statistics in Denmark, Sweden, Belgium. Facts
don't lie... 97% of rapes committed in Sweden were committed by Muslim
immigrants... And you want 10,000 of these people here? Even if just 1%
of these so called "refugees" were ISIS supporters or active ISIS
terrorists, would that be acceptable to you? Chew on it... think about
it. Take a good look at your kids or your wife and decide if the risk is
worth taking. Feel free to share this if you want
By Dave Douglas
By Dave Douglas
Wednesday, February 1, 2017
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)