Roy Moore Sues 4 Women, Claiming Defamation and Conspiracy - The New York Times

Roy Moore Sues 4 Women, Claiming Defamation and Conspiracy - The New York Times:



'via Blog this'

Has this man found a way out of the income tax system?

Has this man found a way out
of the income tax system? 

It is almost impossible to beat the King in his own court. That's why so many who try and fight the income tax system end up owing hefty fines and in prison. The deck is stacked. The CPAs, attorneys and judges all benefit from the system. They are the system. The judges are employees of the state. Withtomorrow being Tax Day, it is all-important that we understand the system for what it really is and what it is not. First off, put the notion from your head that taxes are about funding government. Nothing could be further from the truth. Secondly, put the notion from your head that income tax is a constitutional issue. It is not. Constitutional arguments have never won in the King's court.

Most important message you'll see in 2018.

Modern states all have paper currencies, a debt money system. All forms of government money represent debt. Modern governments could not and would not exist without the power to create debt money plus the income tax system.
Do you not think you are in debt if you have money?
Take a dollar out of your wallet right now and have a look at the bill. At the very top, in big block letters it reads "FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE." A note, dear reader, is a debt. Do you think that it means the government owes you $1 or $5 worth of gold or silver? Surely not, although it used to.
No, the purpose of modern paper currencies (all forms, including computer symbols) is to transfer wealth to the government without payment by the government. The federal government creates modern "money" out of nothing and "pays" it into circulation for something. In other words, the government gets money (any amount of it) first, and passes it into the "economy" for goods and services. Government spenders get the most value from it before prices rise. This is the same as saying that the government actually pays for nothing. It transfers wealth and production to itself FREE through its position as the money creator. It pays not one penny for it, or its use!
Why then the "income tax?" The purpose of the "income tax" is to cover the fraud or to conceal the fraud that massive wealth is being transferred to the government without payment. This cover-up conceals the fact that since the Civil War and Abraham Lincoln’s "greenbacks," paper money is the means of financing all wars and all means and methods of suppressing human liberty, including Christianity.
The vast wealth of governments comes from the creation of money, not from income tax. Why would governments need our income tax if they can create any amount of "money"?
The answer is they don’t need our "income tax" money, but they have to have the "income tax" system to cover their money creation fraud. In other words, the people must believe that their "income taxes" are necessary to support government. All must pay their "fair share." So important is the "income tax system" as a cover-up that it is regulated by threat, coercion, mass brainwashing and a whole system of witchcraft called the tax code. Remember, governments have to conceal their greatest secret, their money machine.
As stated above, the "income tax" is not a constitutional issue. It is a system of Phariseeism promoting general and widespread social depravity and spiritual immorality. It is indeed a spiritual deception.
That governments print money is no state secret. Then why do so few question the meaning of the income tax?
Little children are taught to "pay income tax" in school. All the propaganda says "pay your fair share." It is a complete and absolute brainwash and so big as to defy inquiry. The system is inbred.
Though the income tax is not necessary as a source of government funds in a paper economy, it is very important as a system of regulation. It promotes class warfare and privilege. The government and its politicians can discriminate or favor with the income tax system.
The income tax is a system of entrapment. It has entrapped the American people into merchant law. The very minute you identify yourself as a "taxpayer" by signing a 1040 form, you are immediately under merchant law.
In his 1992 book, "Become A Nontaxpayer And Save," Floyd Wright says, "The greatest secret never told is that the American people have been conned into a contractual agreement with the federal government under the pretense of paying income taxes."
He says that the reason that patriots have gotten entangled in the IRS trap is because they always have tried to use constitutional issues.
Mr. Wright says, "When we execute a 1040 form, we are executing a negotiable instrument. This makes us a merchant and as a merchant, the act of completing a 1040 form completes a contractual agreement and a contractual obligation. This act clearly puts us under the Uniform Commercial Code. Therefore, any pleadings based on the Constitution are frivolous and misplaced."
The American people are victims of a massive entrapment scheme that has conned them out of billions of dollars, as well as millions of hours of recordkeeping and loss of freedom. Federal judges and U.S. attorneys have all conspired against human rights by failing to inform the people of the nature of income tax entrapment.
An Oregon man named Michael Bowman may have found an out – and from an unlikely angle. Bowman describes himself as a Christian and abortion opponent. He says he is refusing to give his money over to a government that funds abortion.
Bowman, a contract engineer who lives in Columbia City, tells Oregonlive.comhe's been up front with the Internal Revenue Service, refusing to file a tax return or pay taxes since 1999 without some accommodation afforded to him for his religious beliefs.
Prosecutors alleged that Bowman hasn't filed an accurate or timely income tax return since at least 1997. He was sent notices from the IRS beginning in 2002 informing him that his federal taxes were "owed" and that there would be penalties, collection actions and liens if he didn’t comply. An indictment was handed down indicating he owed $356,857 for the years 1999-2009. And then the Oregon Department of Revenue began garnishing (stealing) money from his bank account.
Bowman changed his method of financial transactions. He began cashing out his work checks, leaving a minimum amount in his account and operating via cash.
U.S. Attorneys filed charges of felony tax evasion. But his defense attorney argued that Bowman wasn’t evading anything because he was conducting business in the open, banking under his own name and receiving payment for his labor under his own name, and all those transactions were disclosed to the IRS.
A judge agreed and dismissed the felony tax evasion charge. Charges are still pending on four counts of "willful failure to file" (misdemeanors), trumpeting that the act of filing is more important to the government than the money.
"I'm not a tax protester. I love my country. I have a duty to my country," Bowman said, indicating that even though he is attempting to opt out of the prescribed system, he remains a victim of his years of programming.
"I have a duty to my conscience,'' the 53-year-old said, raising his hand and striking his chest, where the front of his shirt spelled out a definition of "conscience." Currently his Christian conscience is winning out over his programming.
And finally, for those who continue to parrot the "fair share" cliché as well as the misnomer that the federal government needs your income taxes as government revenue; you do not understand monetary realism nor the history of government finance. For a true education on monetary realism, you should order our Merrill Jenkins Sr. survival package based on the works of the great monetary genius.
Why do we play this April game every year if it’s not about paying income taxes? What are we doing when we write checks "payable" to the IRS?
What we are actually doing is conforming to the regulation process by reducing the numbers in our "bank account." We are limiting our consumption. This process reduces our bidding against government for what we produced. If we were permitted to spend all of the "money" that we get, prices would go to the moon, the system would collapse as the worthless "money" became useless "money" and the fraud of modern money would be revealed as J.M. Keynes warned.
An unlimited volume of Fed-created money would destroy the system. This has happened in other countries before. This seems to be what is happening in the United States.
So to slow the collapse, every means possible must be found to restrict the supply of spendable money in the hands of the people.

We wish Mr. Bowman the best in his quest to "beat" the system. And as an added bonus, if he succeeds, the anti-abortion movement will grow exponentially.

Yours for the truth,

Bob Livingston
Editor, The Bob Livingston Letter™

LOVE THAT GEORGIA

Georgia Passes Bill That Stings Delta Over N.R.A. Position

Photo

Gov. Nathan Deal of Georgia, right, said he planned to sign a tax bill without a jet fuel tax provision that was stripped out after Delta Air Lines ended a discount for National Rifle Association members. Credit Bob Andres/Atlanta Journal-Constitution, via Associated Press

ATLANTA — Georgia lawmakers approved a bill on Thursday that stripped out a tax break proposal highly coveted by Delta Air Lines — the most stinging punishment that America’s pro-gun forces have leveled so far on one of the many corporations recalibrating their positions on firearms after the Florida high school massacre.

The $50 million sales tax exemption on jet fuel that was sought by Delta, one of Georgia’s biggest employers, had been included in a broader tax-relief bill. But this week, a number of Georgia Republicans, including Lt. Gov. Casey Cagle, sought to remove the perk as retribution for Delta’s decision to end a promotional discount for members of the National Rifle Association.

Delta, in announcing the policy change, said it was trying to remain “neutral” in a national gun debate that has been rekindled by a gunman’s attack at a school in Parkland, Fla., that left 17 people dead. A number of other major American companies, including the car rental company Hertz and MetLife insurance, have also ended relationships with the N.R.A. since the shooting on Feb. 14.

On Thursday, the Georgia Senate overwhelmingly approved a version of the bill without the jet-fuel tax break. The House, which had already approved a version of the bill, also approved the change. Both houses are controlled by Republicans.

The legislation now goes to the desk of the Republican governor, Nathan Deal, who has pledged to sign it into law. But Mr. Deal is a supporter of the jet-fuel tax break, and he said he would sign the bill only because it also included a significant reduction in personal and corporate tax rates.

In a sign of the gulf that has opened between gun-rights purists and Republicans with a more pro-business bent, Mr. Deal this week appeared to chastise fellow Republicans who sought to punish Delta, and thus potentially harm Georgia’s business-friendly reputation.

“Ours is a welcoming state — the epitome of ‘Southern Hospitality,’” said Mr. Deal, who will leave office because of term limits early next year. “We were not elected to give the late-night talk show hosts fodder for their monologues or to act with the type of immaturity that has caused so many in our society to have a cynical view of politics.”

In addition to being one of Georgia’s biggest employers, Delta is the economic engine of Atlanta’s Hartsfield-Jackson Airport, the busiest airport in the world and a bragging point in the city’s claim to national and even international stature.

The divisions over gun control are stark in Georgia, where Mr. Cagle is among a handful of Republicans who are seeking to be the next governor. They are particularly eager to make an impression among the hard-right conservatives who will have a big voice in the Republican primary in May.

Mr. Cagle, the presumptive front-runner in the governor’s race, presides over the State Senate, and his threat on Monday to kill the tax break was interpreted here as a way to protect his right flank from his Republican rivals.

“I think that obviously Delta is free to make any decision that they want to,” Mr. Cagle said during an appearance on “Fox and Friends” this week. He added that Delta “chose to single out the N.R.A. and their membership, law-abiding gun owners, and I don’t think that’s right.” Delta announced on Saturday that it was ending a discount for N.R.A. members traveling to the association’s annual convention.

Other Republican candidates for governor were also eager to weigh in in favor of rescinding the tax break. Secretary of State Brian Kemp said lawmakers should reject the perk to airlines and instead focus on creating a sales tax holiday for buyers of guns, ammunition, holsters and safes where guns can be stored.

On the floor of the Senate on Thursday, Senator Michael Williams, another Republican candidate for governor, praised his fellow lawmakers for stripping the tax exemption, saying they “stood strong” in the face of pressure from liberals, the media and big business.

Mr. Deal has said he was “committed to finding a pathway forward for the elimination of sales tax on jet fuel, which is nonnegotiable.” But the political reality seems to leave him with few options.

Democrats have argued that the attack on Delta, which did not comment Thursday, could harm the ability to attract new businesses, chief among them Amazon. The online retailer named metropolitan Atlanta as one possible location for its new headquarters.

“Unfortunately, we’re looking at political gamesmanship, and trying to send ultraconservative messages for the Republican primary,” said Senator Steve Henson, the minority leader. “I think it does not enhance our chances to get Amazon.”

FLORIDA SCHOOL SHOOTING AND THE OTHERS

The only way to stop this is to have a speedy trial and bring back public executions, hang them on the courthouse square. When others see this bastard kicking, pissing and shitting himself  it will bring this to a stop!

Trey Gowdy: FBI concealed Clinton role in Steele dossier

GOP investigator hopes memo is ‘one-off,’ doesn’t taint Russia probe

Who is the biggest winner in the memo detailing FBI surveillance abuses?

“They could have easily said it was the DNC and Hillary Clinton. That would have been really easy,” said Rep. Trey Gowdy, South Carolina Republican. (Associated Press/File) more >

Print

By Tom Howell Jr. - The Washington Times - Sunday, February 4, 2018

The House’s top investigator on Sunday said the FBI failed to notify a surveillance court that it was relying on material backed by the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign when it asked to snoop on a former adviser to the Trump campaign.
Rep. Trey Gowdy, South Carolina Republican, also said judges wouldn’t have authorized and repeatedly renewed a warrant to spy on the former campaign aide, Carter Page, if it hadn’t been for the material in that very dossier, compiled by former British spy Christopher Steele.
The revelations shouldn’t upend investigations into Russian meddling in the 2016 election, the congressman said, but he thinks the FBI erred by failing to disclose their sources’ anti-Trump agenda in a footnote on their evidence.

---

---

“They could have easily said it was the DNC and Hillary Clinton. That would have been really easy,” Mr. Gowdy told CBS’s “Face the Nation.” “It took longer to explain it the way they did than if they just came right out and said, ‘Hillary Clinton for America and DNC paid for it.’ But they didn’t do that.”
Mr. Gowdy was involved in drafting a bombshell memo that details the FBI’s decision to use the Clinton-backed material to try to spy on Mr. Page in October 2016. It also explores the role of top FBI and Justice Department officials in seeking and renewing those snooping powers.
President Trump said the memo “totally vindicates” him as he is dogged by claims that his 2016 campaign colluded with Russia.

---

SEE ALSO: Memo on FBI surveillance of Trump campaign turns up heat on Deputy A.G. Rod Rosenstein

---

House Speaker Paul D. Ryan, Wisconsin Republican, and Mr. Gowdy say that wasn’t the point of the memo. Yet it has kicked up a political firestorm, with Democrats chastising its lead author — Rep. Devin Nunes, California Republican and chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence — for pulling back the curtain on the secretive U.S. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court and its sensitive processes.
They say the four-page memo amounts to an incomplete “hit job” designed to sow doubt about investigations into the Trump campaign’s interactions with Russians.
Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer, New York Democrat, told Mr. Trump on Sunday to support the release of a paper by Rep. Adam B. Schiff of California that serves as a Democratic rebuttal to Mr. Nunes’ memo, which was released Friday with White House approval.
Republicans on the House intelligence committee voted to reject Mr. Schiff’s memo, even as they green-lighted their own.
“I believe it is a matter of fundamental fairness that the American people be allowed to see both sides of the argument and make their own judgments,” Mr. Schumer said.
He said the Schiff memo sheds new light on why the FBI felt it needed to watch Mr. Page and his interactions with Russians.
Mr. Gowdy said Democrats are the ones being one-sided.
“I get that Adam Schiff and others are worried about what’s not in my memo. I wish that they were equally concerned about what’s not in the FISA application, which is a lot of really important information about the source, and its subsources, and the fact that he was hired by the DNC and the Clinton campaign, and the fact that he was biased against President Trump,” said Mr. Gowdy, who last week said he will return to the legal field instead of seeking re-election.
“I would argue it’s also somewhat unprecedented to rely on political opposition research to instruct and inform an application. And it’s really bad precedent and unprecedented to not tell a court that a source has this level of bias,” he said.
Mr. Gowdy said he hopes the revealing memo is a “one-off,” but he also thinks it’s important to detail how the FBI sought its snooping powers because FISA judges don’t perform independent research.
He is among the top Republicans preaching caution, even as Mr. Trump’s conservative allies say heads should roll at the FBI and Justice Department.
After the memo was released Friday, Mr. Trump told reporters that the FBI’s conduct was a disgrace. He refused to say whether he had confidence in Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who signed at least one of the surveillance applications and later appointed Robert Mueller as special counsel to investigate the Russia accusations.
Senate Democrats say any move to upend the Russia investigations would cross a red line akin the 1973 “Saturday Night Massacre,” in which President Nixon’s attorney general and his deputy opted to resign rather than carry out the president’s order to fire Watergate prosecutor Archibald Cox.
“To say that that’s the end of the investigation, that this is all that Donald Trump needs to fire Rosenstein or to fire Bob Mueller, I’ll just tell you, this could precipitate a constitutional crisis,” Senate Minority Whip Richard J. Durbin, Illinois Democrat, told CNN’s “State of the Union.”
The New York Times recently reported that Mr. Trump ordered Mr. Mueller’s firing in June, only to back off when the White House counsel threatened to resign.
Former White House Chief of Staff Reince Priebus, who was ousted in July, said he never got the sense that Mr. Trump wanted to or tried to get rid of Mr. Mueller.
“I never heard the idea or the concept that this person needed to be fired. I never felt that it was relayed to me that way either,” Mr. Priebus told NBC’s “Meet the Press.” “And I would know the difference between a level-10 situation, as reported in that story, and what was reality. And it just, to me, it wasn’t reality.”
Mr. Gowdy took pains to divorce his work on the Nunes memo from the Mueller investigation, which he said goes far beyond the Steele dossier.
“There is a Russia investigation without a dossier,” he said, rattling off a list of other events, such as a mysterious meeting between a Russian lawyer and Trump officials at Trump Tower.
The Republican memo says the FBI dug into the Trump campaign after another one of its aides, George Papadopoulos, reportedly boasted in mid-2016 that Russia had dirt on Mrs. Clinton.
Furthermore, Mr. Gowdy said the Republican memo “doesn’t have anything to do with obstruction of justice,” something Mr. Mueller is reportedly exploring after Mr. Trump fired FBI Director James B. Comey last year.
Democrats have warned Mr. Trump not to use the memo to terminate Mr. Rosenstein, too, saying it would cross a red line.
Richard Painter, the chief ethics attorney for President George W. Bush, said the public outcry over Mr. Rosenstein’s firing might be enough to stop the president from pulling the trigger.
“If he wants to fire Rosenstein, it will get ugly,” Mr. Painter said. “He’ll just dig himself into a bigger hole with obstruction accusations because it will seem like he’s firing Rosenstein to get at Mueller. The advice I would give him is to leave it alone. If the president just stops, that could minimize his exposure to possible obstruction of justice.”
The Nunes memo largely focuses on Mr. Steele’s role and conflicts of interest that pointed to a pattern of bias against Mr. Trump.
Mr. Steele said he obtained information about Mr. Trump from unidentified officials at the Kremlin in Moscow. His dossier was eventually given to Fusion GPS, a liberal research firm funded by the Clinton campaign and DNC.
Then-deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe told the House intelligence committee in December that a surveillance warrant for Mr. Page would not have been sought without the information from Mr. Steele.
Mr. McCabe retired earlier than expected on Jan. 29, one day after FBI Director Christopher Wray saw the memo.
The document also details a partisan conflict of then-Associate Deputy Attorney General Bruce Ohr, who was in contact with Mr. Steele while Mr. Ohr’s wife was employed by Fusion GPS “to assist in the cultivation of opposition research on Trump” for Mrs. Clinton.
“Ohr later provided the FBI with all of his wife’s opposition research, paid for by the DNC and Clinton campaign via Fusion GPS,” the memo stated. “The Ohrs’ relationship with Steele and Fusion GPS was inexplicably concealed from the [court].”
In September 2016, Mr. Steele acknowledged to Mr. Ohr his dislike for then-candidate Trump, saying he was “desperate that Donald Trump not get elected and was passionate about him not being president,” the memo said.
“This clear evidence of Steele’s bias was recorded by Ohr at the time and subsequently in official FBI files but not reflected in any of the Page FISA applications,” the Nunes memo said.
Mr. Ohr was demoted at Justice late last year.

Texts Reportedly Show Former Mueller Team Members Knew Charges Wouldn't Be Filed Against Clinton

JENNI FINK | JAN 21, 2018 | 3:59 PM

Jamie McCarthy/Getty Images

After text messages between senior FBI lawyer Lisa Page and agent Peter Strzok revealed a heavy bias against President Donald Trump, Strzok was reassigned to the FBI's human resources department.
However, before he was reassigned, he worked on the investigation into whether former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton mishandled classified information on her private email account.
According to Fox News, the U.S. Department of Justice supplied congressional committees with 384 pages of text messages.
Lawmakers told Fox News that some of the newly discovered ones indicate that Page and Strzok knew Clinton wouldn't be charged before she was even interviewed.
Fox News reported one of the exchanges between the two parties referenced then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch's decision to accept the FBI's conclusion after an impromptu meeting with former President Bill Clinton.
“Timing looks like hell,” Strzok reportedly texted Page.
“Yeah, that is awful timing,” Page wrote back and added later, “It's a real profile in couragw (sic), since she knows no charges will be brought.”
Clinton met with the FBI for a three-hour interview on July 2, 2016. Fox News reported the exchange is dated July 1, 2016.
A recent report by The Daily Caller also revealed that the FBI “failed to preserve” text messages between Page and Strzok from Dec. 14, 2016, to May 17, 2017.
Stephen Boyd, the assistant attorney general for legislative affairs at the Justice Department, said “misconfiguration issues” caused the data to not be “automatically collected and retained for long-term storage and retrieval.”

FBI officials worried about being too tough on Hillary Clinton during email investigation

FBI officials worried about being too tough on Hillary Clinton during email investigation, texts show

Strzok-Page text messages recovered for key dates

The political rhetoric over the FISA abuse memo took a new turn with the ranking Democrat drafting his own version; Catherine Herridge goes in-depth for 'Special Report.'

FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page were concerned about being too tough on Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton during the bureau’s investigation into her email practices because she might hold it against them as president, text messages released on Thursday indicated.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley released new messages between bureau officials Page and Strzok, who were having an affair and exchanged more than 50,000 texts with each other during the election.

“One more thing: she might be our next president,” Page texted Strzok on Feb. 25, 2016, in the midst of the presidential campaign, in reference to Clinton.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley released new messages between bureau officials Lisa Page and Peter Strzok, who were having an affair and exchanged more than 50,000 texts with each other.  (Copyright 2017 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.)

“The last thing you need [is] going in there loaded for bear,” she continued. “You think she’s going to remember or care that it was more [DOJ] than [FBI]?”
Strzok replied that he “agreed” and he had relayed their discussion with someone named “Bill.”
Strzok not only worked on the Clinton case, but was assigned to the special counsel’s probe into Russia and the Trump campaign after a number of anti-Trump texts were discovered on his phone. Page also briefly worked on the special counsel investigation.
DOJ RECOVERS MISSING TEXT MESSAGES BETWEEN ANTI-TRUMP FBI AGENTS STRZOK AND PAGE
Grassley, an Iowa Republican, said Thursday in a letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray that the exchange, among others, concerned him.
“The text messages that were provided raise serious concerns about the impartiality of senior leadership running both the Clinton and Trump investigations,” Grassley said.

FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page were concerned about being too tough on Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton during the bureau’s investigation into her email practices because she might hold it against them as president, newly released text messages indicate.

During the campaign, the FBI investigated Clinton’s use of a private email server while she was secretary of state. Then-FBI Director James Comey decided against recommending prosecution, but faulted Clinton and her associates for being “extremely careless” with classified information.
Republicans, arguing some top officials at the FBI are politically biased against Trump, have seized on the texts, including one where Strzok and Page spoke of a “secret society” within the Department of Justice and the FBI and Strzok spoke of an “insurance policy” against a Trump win.
New texts released by Grassley on Thursday also indicated that FBI officials believed FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe should be recused from the Clinton investigation because of his family’s ties to Virginia Democratic Gov. Terry McAuliffe, who is close with the Clintons.
In an October 28, 2016 text exchange, Page told Strzok that then- FBI Chief of Staff James Rybicki thought McCabe should not have participated in the probe.
“Rybicki just called to check in,” she wrote. “He very clearly 100% believes that Andy should be recused because of the ‘perception.’”
“God,” Strzok replied.
Asked by Page why McCabe should be recused now, if not before, Strzok said: “I assume McAuliffe picked up.”
McCabe eventually recused himself from the Clinton probe one week before the election.

New texts released by Grassley on Thursday also indicate FBI officials believed FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe should be recused from the Clinton investigation because of his family’s ties to Virginia Democratic Gov. Terry McAuliffe, who is close with the Clintons.

“If McCabe eventually recused himself one week before the election, why did he not do so sooner?” Grassley asked Wray in the letter.
Grassley also told Wray he was concerned that Page and Strzok were transmitting government records on personal systems inappropriately. In a June 2017 message, Strzok wrote of typing a document on a “home computer.”
The senator said Page and Strzok also referenced other conversations “via iMessage, presumably on their personal Apple devices.”
“It appears that Strzok and Page transmitted federal records pertaining to the Clinton investigation on private, non-government services,” Grassley said. “It is important to determine whether their own similar conduct was a factor in not focusing on and developing evidence of similar violations by Secretary Clinton and her aides.”
The new messages surfaced the same day the Justice Department’s inspector general said he recovered a number of missing text messages between Strzok and Page.
Fox News has learned from U.S. government officials that the inspector general recovered the texts by taking possession of "at least four" phones belonging to Strzok and Page