Thursday, February 25, 2016

Smith & Wesson M&P 10

Smith & Wesson M&P 10 Modern Sporting Rifle
Smith & Wesson M&P 10 Modern Sporting Rifle Receives ‘Readers’ Choice Award’
Smith & Wesson
Smith & Wesson
Springfield, MA -- Smith & Wesson Corp. today announced that the company’s M&P10 rifle was recognized as the top performing hunting modern sporting rifle by Game & Fish/Sportsman magazine.
Smith & Wesson General Manager for the M&P brand, Jan Mladek, was presented with the prestigious “Readers’ Choice Award” during the 2016 SHOT Show in Las Vegas, Nevada.
More than 5,000 Game & Fish/Sportsman readers cast their votes in the magazine’s 2015 Readers’ Choice Awards and provided personal opinions about their experiences using the Smith & Wesson M&P10 rifle. Qualified voters were longtime hunters and shooters who have enjoyed the sport for multiple years. The M&P10 received over 50 percent of the total votes cast and more than double the number of votes received for the second and third place modern sporting rifles.
“On behalf of everyone at Smith & Wesson, I would like to thank the readers of Game & Fish/Sportsman magazine for selecting the M&P10 as the top performing hunting modern sporting rifle,” said Jan Mladek, General Manager for the M&P brand. “This award recognizes the exceptional value and capability that the M&P10 offers to hunters while highlighting its versatility in the field. The entire family of M&P15 rifles was developed to meet the high demands of a wide group of dedicated sportsmen and women.”
Designed to be fully ambidextrous, the M&P10, chambered in .308 WIN/ 7.62x51mm, is well suited for long-range applications, big game hunting or competition. As one of the lightest rifles in its class, the M&P10 tips the scales at just 7.71 pounds and is fitted with leading edge features including 5R rifling, an adjustable 6-position CAR stock, patented Smith & Wesson enhanced flash hider (on select models) and an 18-inch barrel. The modular system M&P10 is standard with ambidextrous dual magazine releases, bolt catches and safety selector.
Reliability features of the M&P10 include a durable corrosion resistant Armornite barrel finish a a chrome-lined bolt carrier, gas key and firing pin. On top of the upper receiver, Smith & Wesson has placed a Picatinny-style optic ready flat top. A secondary rail on top of gas block is also standard and facilitates the use of aftermarket iron sights. Additional features on the upper receiver include a front sling attachment and an AR-style forward assist. On the lower receiver, Smith & Wesson has added a forward serrated edge on the magwell for increased firearm control and rear sling attachment.
From the rifle’s enhanced features to its user specific design, the M&P10 offers a versatile and dependable option for a wide array of sport shooting activities. The M&P10 has been engineered using the highest quality components and is thoroughly tested to withstand the rigors of excessive use in the field.
Smith & Wesson M&P 10 Modern Sporting Rifle
Smith & Wesson M&P 10 Modern Sporting Rifle
The M&P10 represents the collective feedback of consumers across the country as well as more than 160 years of experience from the legendary firearms manufacturer.
About Smith & Wesson:
Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC) is a U.S.-based leader in firearm manufacturing and design, delivering a broad portfolio of quality firearms, related products, and training to the global military, law enforcement, and consumer markets. The company’s firearm division brands include Smith & Wesson, M&P, and Thompson/Center Arms. As an industry leading manufacturer of shooting, reloading, gunsmithing and gun cleaning supplies, the company’s accessories division produces innovative, top quality products under Battenfeld Technologies, Inc., including Caldwell Shooting Supplies, Wheeler Engineering, Tipton Gun Cleaning Supplies, Frankford Arsenal Reloading Tools, Lockdown Vault Accessories, and Hooyman Premium Tree Saws. Smith & Wesson facilities are located in Massachusetts, Maine, Connecticut, and Missouri.
For more information on Smith & Wesson, call (800) 331-0852 or log on to www.Smith-Wesson.com.

Tuesday, February 23, 2016

Obama's ATF wants to BAN your AR-15 Ammo - sign the petition against this now!



Sign The Petition Now, Before It's Too Late!

Dear Concerned American,
If you own an AR-15, and don’t want your sources of inexpensive, effective ammunition to be ripped away from you, then you absolutely must read every word of this urgent letter.
Because if you don’t act now, your AR-15 could get turned into nothing more than an expensive paper weight because you won’t ever be able to get ammunition for it again ...
This is 1,000 times worse than any ammo shortage we’ve suffered over the past few years ...
And it affects anyone who owns guns (not just AR-15 owners, although they’re the first target as always).
In short, if you care at all about your rights as an American you must know what’s going on.
Here’s the story ...
In the dead of night on February 13, 2015, the ATF rammed through a unilateral ban on M855 “green tip” ammo.
As if that wasn’t bad enough – the way they’ve justified their ban – they could use this same reasoning to ban all AR-15 ammunition in the near future.
In short, this is nothing more than ....

The Biggest “Back Door” Attempt At Gun Control
the Federal Government Has Ever Attempted!

And I’m counting on you today to make sure we don’t let this stand.
Here’s what you need to know ...
Obama has publically stated that his gun control failures are his “biggest frustration” ... and ... he wants Australian style gun control in the USA (universal registration and Federal confiscation) ...
So far, every direct attempt at gun control by Obama’s administration has failed ...
That’s why the ATF is trying to sneak their way in the “back door” to gun control by simply banning ammunition ...
And this new gun control measure by the ATF is aimed squarely at disarming the American public of one of the most popular types of AR-15 ammunition.
The most popular rifle in America is the AR-15 and it uses 5.56/.223 Remington ammunition ...
Now, the two most common 5.56 rounds are the 55gr M193 and the 62gr “green tip” M855. Both of these are full metal jacket (FMJ) designs originally used by the military and have been widely available for sale to civilians for over 30+ years ...
The ATF has announced that they’re now banning the 62gr M855 because they claim that it has no sporting purpose and is armor piercing and that they must do it to “protect law enforcement officers” ...
In 1986, the ATF had previously exempted M855 ammunition from being labeled “armor piercing” because it found it “has been recognized as being suitable for target shooting with rifles due to its accuracy” ...
However, now they are claiming that this ammunition must be banned because it can be used in both “AR-type” rifles and “AR-type” handguns.
And simply because it can be fired from a semi-automatic handgun, they claim they can ban it in the name of officer safety in accordance with the provisions governing armor piecing ammunition were originally enacted in the Law Enforcement Officers Protection Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-408) (“LEOPA”)
In short, if a rifle round can also ... possibly ... in any way ... be used in a semi-automatic handgun, then it is a danger to police officers and must be banned.

The problem is: it’s a complete lie!

M855 is not a threat to police officers.
Our research has found no news reports of police officers ever having been shot with M855 ammunition. Nor have their ever been any reports of an AR-15 type pistol loaded with M855 ammunition being used to kill a police officer.
In fact, a 2006 U.S. Department of Justice study found ZERO instances where an “AR-type” firearm was used to kill police officers.
Much less an “AR-type” pistol loaded with M855 ammunition that defeated an officer’s body armor ...
In other words, the ATF is creating an imaginary reason for banning one of the most common types of AR-15 ammunition available to civilians.
Why? Simply because they can’t ban your access to this rifle, so they want to make it harder for you to get cheap, reliable, ammunition for your AR-15 – the most popular rifle in America.
Now, even if you don’t care about M855 ammunition, here’s what you must understand ...

This Ruling Gives The ATF a Backdoor To
Ban All AR-15 Ammunition In The Future!

The ATF is claiming that they are making this change to “protect the lives and safety of law enforcement officers from the threat posed by ammunition capable of penetrating a protective vest” ...
Essentially the ATF is arguing that if a rifle round falls under the definition of “Armor piercing” and can penetrate a police officer’s protective vest ...
AND there is a possibility that it can be fired from a semi-automatic handgun ...
Then they have the authority to ban it as armor piercing ammunition.
As you might know ...
Protective vests commonly worn by police officers are generally of the “soft body armor” type and only rated to stop common handgun rounds .
That means all AR-15 ammunition will penetrate common protective vests worn by police officers on patrol because all AR-15 ammunition are rifle rounds ...
So it stands to reason that if the ATF can get away with banning M855 because it can penetrate protective vests ... and because it can be fired from an “AR-type” pistol ... then they can ban every single type of AR-15 ammunition in existence because they can all penetrate soft body armor designed to stop nothing bigger than .357 magnum handgun rounds!
And make no mistake ...
The timing of this scandal is not accidental ...
The facts are ...
President Obama is serving his last term in office. He has no reason to hold back on pushing gun control measures because he is not worried about being re-elected.
His administration, and the ATF specifically, will do everything in their power to strip American citizens of their rights to bear arms ...
And if they can’t do that with outright gun bans then they will use “back door” methods to make your rights impotent because they know that a gun without ammunition is little more than a paperweight.

This is how Americans—
how you will lose your rights
— one inch at a time ...

When the 2nd Amendment was written the founders made it clear that guns were necessary to ensure the survival of the new system of liberty—the first of its kind—they had founded in America
Contrary to the ideas of anti-gun politicians – it was fully intended that every day American citizens would own “military grade” weaponry.
In fact, during the American Revolution, in a country of less than 4 million people, there are records for at least 2,200 privately owned warships.
Even as late as 1925, anyone with $225 could purchase a fully automatic Thompson Submachine Gun (the famous “Tommy Gun”) by mail order, or from the local hardware or sporting goods store.
It wasn’t until President Franklin Roosevelt passed the National Firearms Act (NFA) of 1934 that American’s started to see the first inch of Federal gun control strip their rights as machine guns, short barreled rifles, and other items such as silencers were regulated ...
In 1968, more and more inches were taken with the passing of the Gun Control Act of 1968 (GCA). This is actually one of the laws the ATF is using to try to ban this ammo.

These Gun Control Tactics Are Based On
The Nazi Weapons Law of 1938 ...

The “Gun Control Act” of 1968 (GCA) attempts to regulate whether a firearm or its ammunition is legal for you and I based upon whether it has a “sporting purpose” or not.
What most people don’t realize is that this language was written into the GCA by Senator Thomas Dodd, a Senator who would shortly after be censured and thrown out of office because of rampant corruption ...
It’s widely believed Senator Dodd got the idea for the “sporting purposes test” from the Nazi gun control schemes used to disarm their civilians and murder them ...
Senator Dodd personally owned a copy of the Nazi Weapons Law of 1938 and according to extensive research, the GCA tracks the Nazi Weapons Law of 1938 in structure in effect.
The most obvious connection is the “sporting purposes test” – matching the Nazi law almost word-for-word once translated – that is now being twisted to ban M855 ammunition.
The GCA also asserts that the power to determine whether a firearm or ammunition has a “sporting purpose” is vested in the Secretary of the Treasury. The Nazi Weapons Law gave the same power to its own unelected bureaucracy.
That’s why I must ask you to ...

ACT NOW

Gun control is not about guns. It’s about control.
The roots of the current law being used by the ATF to attempt to ban one of the most common forms of AR-15 ammunition are straight out of the Nazi Weapons Law playbook ...
As gun owners ... as Americans ... we can’t let this stand.

Sign the petition below against
the ATF banning M855 ammunition.

If you do nothing, you will lose another source of cheap, accurate, very versatile ammunition that can be used for anything from defending your family, to hunting, to target shooting ...
If you think that this does not concern you because you are a hunter ... or you don’t like AR-15’s ... or you only care about your particular ammo because you don’t use M855, then you are wrong.
If you don’t speak up now ... if you don’t stand against this ban ... then who will speak up for you when the ATF suddenly decides – during the cover of darkness over a holiday weekend – that your favorite ammunition is now unlawful?

Get Angry!

And please sign the petition below.
Only by fighting for our rights, by standing up as a unified force of Americans can we make the un-elected bureaucrats in Washington understand that they can’t change our lives and direct our futures whenever they want to change their own moods.
That’s why I’m sure I can count on you to sign our petition.
There’s an old saying that applies perfectly in this situation, "silence gives consent."
If you do not sign this petition, these power-hungry bureaucrats will know no one cares about its rules.
They’ll think this enormous grab for power by the ATF has not angered anyone.
So please, say something, because this is the moment of truth.
Your signature gives decisive democratic legitimacy to the efforts of our organization Prepared Gun Owners.
And after signing the petition, please forward this message to all your contacts. Share it on Facebook. Put it on whatever Social Media you have.
Tell them it's time to act.
There’s no time to lose.
Thank you.
We will keep you informed on the progress of our efforts.
Sincerely,
Caleb Lee
President of PreparedGunOwners.com

Don’t Let Obama’s ATF
Get Away With Banning M855 “Green Tip” AR-15 Ammo!

EMERGENCY ALERT:

PETITION TO THE ATF

Dear ATF,
I strongly oppose reclassifying M855 ammunition as armor piercing!
Because of the high lead-content of its bullet, M855 does not even meet the BATFE's own definition of armor piercing ammunition.
M855 is simply accurate ammunition that has been used for sporting purposes for many years. I myself use it.
Nothing, including new handguns that are capable of shooting M855 ammunition, changes that fact.
Finally, the recent rulings by the United States Supreme Court that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to keep and bear arms, by necessity also protects an individual's right to have ammunition designed for use with those arms.






This Petition Sponsored By:
By signing our petition and providing your email, you are consenting to receive emails from UGAR LLC, stopthem855ban.com, preparedgunowners.com, and undergroundassaultrifle.com.
This is an absolutely free service we provide to provide you valuable information and you are under no obligation.
You may unsubscribe at any time.
UGAR LLC | 2215 Plank Road #111 | Fredericksburg, VA 22401 | United States

BRING BACK PUBLIC HANGING

Once again I say 'why is this piece of shit still breathing?'

Kalamazoo Uber driver Jason Dalton confessed to deadly shooting spree, detective says

  Hang him by the neck until dead and do it in the public eye!

BRING BACK PUBLIC HANGING

Sunday, February 21, 2016

ISIS beheads 15-year-old Iraqi boy for listening to pop music

Just when you thought Islamic State had reached its limit of depravity, it manages to outdo itself.

According to Kurdish media reports, the jihadist group that has captured wide swaths of Syria and Iraq beheaded a 15-year-old boy in Mosul for the crime of listening to Western pop music.

Reports cite officials in the northern Iraqi city as saying that the boy, Ayham Hussein, was discovered by ISIS henchman as he was listening to a portable compact disc player.

Hussein was detained by ISIS operatives as he sat inside a shop owned by his father in an open-air market in western Mosul. The boy was beaten and tried in a local sharia court, which sentenced him to be executed.

“The boy was executed by beheading in a town square in the center of the city,” a source told Kurdish media.

The execution shocked and angered Mosul residents, some of whom staged a protest at the home of the victim’s family.

Saturday, February 20, 2016

Remember Justice Scalia this November

Remember Justice Scalia this November

Friday, February 19, 2016
If Barack Obama and those like him fail in their goal of “fundamentally transforming the United States of America,” it will be in large part because of United States Supreme Court Senior Associate Justice Antonin Gregory Scalia. Sadly, Justice Scalia passed away over the weekend.
Since his nomination to the Court by President Ronald Reagan in 1986, Justice Scalia championed the view that the U.S. Constitution should be interpreted according to the intent of those who wrote it, not according to shifting social conventions or judicial preferences. The Constitution, Justice Scalia once said, “means today not what current society, much less the court, thinks it ought to mean, but what it meant when it was adopted.” As William Murchison of the Dallas Morning News wrote on Tuesday, Scalia’s understanding of the constitution “came from his respect for the wisdom of the document, which was tailored to preserve freedom.”
Those of us who follow Second Amendment issues are most familiar with Justice Scalia’s “originalist” or “textualist” approach to interpreting the Constitution based upon the Court’s landmark decision in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008). In Heller, Justice Scalia, writing for the majority, stated that the Second Amendment was intended to protect an “individual right to possess and carry weapons in case of confrontation,” without regard to service in a state militia. That right, he said “extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding.”
Gun control advocates immediately decried the decision, falsely claiming that it invented an individual right out of thin air. Predictably, they are continuing to do so after Justice Scalia’s passing. However, the record clearly shows that Heller expressly articulated, in greater detail, the individual right the Court had recognized in previous Second Amendment-related cases and that our Founding Fathers intended the Second Amendment to guarantee.
Besides his majority opinion in Heller, Justice Scalia also was known for his stinging dissents in cases in which he thought the Court’s majority had improperly legislated from the bench. Columnist George Will wrote on Sunday, Scalia “often dissented in the hope of shaping a future replete with majorities steeped in principles he honed while in the minority.”
Whether those principles and the Heller decision survive will depend in large part upon the actions of the current Senate and the outcome of this year’s presidential election. Fellow Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who dissented from the majority opinion in Heller and in McDonald v. Chicago (2010) (which held that the Second Amendment was incorporated by the Fourteenth Amendment to apply against state and local action) has said she would like to see Heller overturned. Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton also said as much on the campaign trail recently.
Anticipating his eventual departure from the Court, Justice Scalia once said, “I would not like to be replaced by someone who immediately sets about undoing what I’ve tried to do for 25, 26 years.” To prevent that from happening, from now until the polls close on Election Day in November, support a candidate who will counter the antigun agenda of Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders or Michael Bloomberg, and who will nominate Supreme Court justices who will honor and follow the legacy of Justice Antonin Scalia.

Wednesday, February 17, 2016

Remembering a Vile Civil War Act, on Fifth Avenue

Remembering a Vile Civil War Act, on Fifth Avenue

Photo
“The Riots at New York — The Rioters Burning and Sacking the Colored Orphan Asylum,” a wood engraving from Harper’s Weekly, Aug. 1, 1863. Credit New-York Historical Society
 Share This Page
Were more hateful words ever howled by a mob in New York history?
“Burn the niggers’ nest.”
This was one of the cries taken up by a crowd that descended on the Colored Orphan Asylum during the first night of the draft riots in July 1863. The sentiments left no doubt about the attackers’ goal: to kill African-American children.
Providence and quick thinking spared the 233 youths from death or injury, though the riots would claim more than 100 lives. But the asylum, a Greek Revival building that sat prettily atop a hillock off Fifth Avenue, between West 43rd and 44th Streets, was destroyed by the mob.
“Some 500 of them entered the house,” the asylum managers reported on July 25, 1863, in a record book now kept at the New-York Historical Society. “After despoiling it of Furniture, Bedding, Clothing, &c. &c. — they deliberately sat fire to it, in different parts — simply because it was the home of unoffending colored Orphan Children.”
It has always been painful to contemplate the sack of the orphanage. It is difficult even to picture it, at what is now a busy intersection in Midtown Manhattan, next to the Century Association clubhouse and across West 43rd Street from a Joe Fresh store and an Elie Tahari showroom in the former Manufacturers Hanover bank, a landmark of the International style.
Photo
“Infant School, Colored Orphan Asylum,” circa 1860. Credit The Jeffrey Kraus Collection
For now, however, the south half of the asylum site is vacant, nothing more than a 10,625-square-foot lot strewn with rubble, including brick fragments. Many brick fragments. So many brick fragments that you begin to wonder: Could any of these have been used to build the asylum?
If so, could there be artifacts strewn among them, plowed under the charred rubble long ago?
A broken hair comb?
An inky pen nib?
A small shoe buckle?
The moment has come to ask such questions because the developer Louis Ceruzzi plans to redevelop the site with a tower more than 70 stories tall that will certainly have retail space at the base and is likely to include a mix of hotel rooms and apartments above.
Photo
A developer plans to redevelop the site where the asylum stood, on Fifth Avenue between 43rd and 44th Streets, with a tower more than 70 stories tall that will certainly have retail space at the base and is likely to include a mix of hotel rooms and apartments above. Credit Byron Smith for The New York Times
An opportunity is at hand to examine the site closely in the hope of finding some tangible remnant of the asylum. Even if there are no archaeological finds, there is certainly a chance to commemorate the asylum and memorialize its pillage in some form at the new building.
The New-York Historical Society has a trove of documents from the Association for the Benefit of Colored Orphans, founded in 1836, including admissions records that would make it possible to create a roster of the children who were living in the asylum at the time of the draft riots.
There was, for instance, Lucinda Ann Brown, 7, who had been brought to New York from New Orleans by one Catherine Flint. Lucinda’s father was dead at the time. Her mother, though alive, had remained in Louisiana. Lucinda was admitted on May 16, 1863.
Sarah Jones was admitted to the asylum 13 days later, on her seventh birthday. Because her adopted mother was working as a stewardess aboard the steamship Ocean Queen, which traveled to Colón, Panama, Sarah was institutionalized by the Commissioners of Public Charities.
Nine-year-old Irving R. White; his younger sister, Martha Ann White; and their younger brother, Robert Cooper White, were all admitted on June 2. Their mother was dead and their father was in a temperance house in Albany run by Edward C. Delavan.
Then, on July 6, just a week before the riot, came William H. Judson, age and circumstances unrecorded.
Photo
An untitled tinted view of a playroom with boys and girls at the asylum, circa 1860. Credit The Jeffrey Kraus Collection
Lucinda, Sarah, Irving, Martha, Robert and William were all presumably there when mobs protesting the inequitable military draft began to vent their fury on any African-American unlucky enough to be in their way. Soon enough, the rioters chose a target where they must have known resistance would be unlikely: an orphanage.
“The destruction of this Asylum, supported, as it was, solely by charity, is certainly one of the worst and wickedest of crimes that were perpetrated during this memorable day,” The New York Times said two days later, “and clearly shows that resistance to the draft is but a cry raised to cover the most atrocious crimes that human nature is capable of committing.”
All that is believed to have survived intact is a Bible that an 8-year-old girl rescued by returning to the burning building. It, too, is in the hands of the New-York Historical Society.
Having been sheltered in a police precinct house, the children were removed safely to Blackwells Island (now Roosevelt Island). Though the institution’s mission, name and location have changed since the Civil War, its work is continued today by the Harlem Dowling-West Side Center for Children and Family Services.
To judge from his blog, Mr. Ceruzzi is fascinated by New York City history. Whether that translates to support for an archaeological dig and permanent memorial at 520 Fifth Avenue is another question. He did not respond to emails for comment.
The Landmarks Preservation Commission said through a spokeswoman that it had reviewed the site in 2008 and determined that it was “unlikely to contain intact archaeological resources.”
But 35 years of covering — and uncovering — the layers of New York City history have taught me that traces of the past are seldom eradicated entirely. And the story of the Colored Orphan Asylum seems too important to forget.

Judge Jeanine Pirro Destroys Geraldo on Hillary Emails

Hillary Clinton’s email scandal is not going away. In fact, it just keeps getting worse for her as the case unfolds.
Most recently, it was revealed that the former Secretary of State had information on her private unsecured server that was so secret, lawyers involved in the case were not even allowed to go over the evidence without getting higher clearances.
That hasn’t stopped the army of Clinton supporters within the media from minimizing and rationalizing away the seriousness of the issue as well-respected legal scholars and judges continue to weigh in on the side that is calling for Hillary’s indictment.
Geraldo Rivera of Fox News is one of those who consistently defends Hillary on this issue. When he and Judge Jeanine Pirro appeared on ‘Fox & Friends’ recently, the two debated the issue.
Judge Pirro, demonstrating a superior knowledge of the law and this case in particular, completely destroyed Geraldo’s apologist stance with the facts.
When Geraldo accused the judge of playing politics, she responded, “She made Americans vulnerable because she had a non-secure server. This is about justice — this is about the law. This is about a woman who is not above the law even though she thinks she is.”
Do you think the Judge go it right on this one? Do Hillary deserve to be indicted for this?